1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

So long, Party Poker

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Pilot, Oct 13, 2006.

  1. Lester Bangs

    Lester Bangs Active Member

    GOP leadership doesn't gamble much, but the child porn thing would really hit to the heart of their base ...
     
  2. Ric Flair guy

    Ric Flair guy Member

    This is riddiculous. I have about $300 in an account with Pinnacle Sports that I deposited using Net Teller. I'm going to keep it in there and keep playing. It's fun. This was a smart move by the Republicans to keep this under the rug and tack it on the port security bill. Their support among 21-35 males would take a serious hit if the media ever picks up on this story in any substantial way.
     
  3. Pringle

    Pringle Active Member

    The party for small government strikes again.
     
  4. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Ric: As word spreads, just another reason for swing voters to flip off the rutting pigs in charge.
     
  5. Claws for Concern

    Claws for Concern Active Member

    When the chips are down they're really down.
     
  6. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Brilliant.
     
  7. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Gambling online has not been made illegal by this new law. It is directed at banks and CC companies to not allow deposits to such sites. Some sites are playing it safe by blocking United States IP addresses from playing, but really it is just the depositing of money there that has been made illegal by this new law. And companies have 270 days to comply.

    The companies that are blocking IP addresses are primarily public companies with stockholders, so they are moving to protect their stock prices.
     
  8. MU_was_not_so_hard

    MU_was_not_so_hard Active Member

    I had tried to set up a NetTeller acct about 20 months ago, but was rejected both times by Bank of America, the normally wonderful establishment that hold my $$$$.
    I was worried that BOA had screwed up my personal account, and when I contacted someone at the regional corporate office, I was told BOA had made a hand shake agreement to decline NetTeller transfers within several states, mine being one of them.
    Looking back, it was kind of telling, considering how long it took to push this through as far as its gotten.
     
  9. Beef03

    Beef03 Active Member

    I know this is what it said in the story, but it makes absolutely no sense. It is not illeagle to gamble on line, but it is illegal to access your bank account or credit cards on line in order to gamble. Question. How are you supposed to be able to gamble on line if you cannot access your account or credit card? and Why has the government taken such an interest in it?
     
  10. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    You could still send a check or money order or Traveler's checks through the mail to load your account if the poker site isn't blocking US IP addresses.

    And the government has taken an interest because it's election season and this is an easy issue for conservative members on both sides to brag about passing. I mean, they just saved The Children from the evils of Internet gambling.
     
  11. Dessens71

    Dessens71 Member

    Could the poker sites argue in court that poker is a game of skill, like tennis or golf? It's not illegal to have a cash prize for the winner of a golf tournament, is it?
     
  12. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    That's what some are trying to do, in public forums . . . but they're not going to live, while
    on-line sportsbetting doesn't . . . both, or neither.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page