1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sitting RGIII--good football move?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by printit, Dec 11, 2013.

  1. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Well, but that's part of the package with him, just like it is with Michael Vick and some other guys. You don't put him out there to just stand in the pocket and fire the ball downfield. Plenty of other guys can do that as well or better. What he gives you that others don't is the mobility dimension. If you're not going to use that, it significantly reduces his value, it seems.
     
  2. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Of course he's going to say he agrees with it. What assistant would say otherwise?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 1, 2015
  3. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    Well, in this case, apparently he did.
     
  4. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    Whitlock weighs in:

    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/10121701/nfl-rg-iii-victim-own-swagger
     
  5. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    Pontification from way far away. Goodie.
     
  6. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    This isn't the Big 12.
    Or the league circa the time of Cunningham.
    Every team - even the shittiest - has speed out the rectum.
    A mobile quarterback who can do only that isn't extraordinary in this epoch of NFL offense.
     
  7. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Ok, then. Why all the hype over the Griffins and Kaepernicks and Wilsons of the world?
     
  8. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Passing fad, like hula hoops.
    Disco dancing, pet rocks,
    and the Wildcat.
     
  9. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Brady, Elway, Bradshaw, Montana, Staubach, Aikman, Roethlisberger, E. Manning, Plunkett, Starr and Griese. They have 28 Super Bowl Rings. They are also QBs that don't run. Some can scramble, some can move to avoid a sack or buy time but they aren't running QBs. Which is different than being a 'mobile QB'

    Throw in Flacco, Rogers, Brees, Favre, P.Manning, Warner, Simms, McMahon, Stabler, Unitas, Namath

    It's not as if some running QBs are successful in the NFL, NO RUNNING QBS ARE SUCCESSFUL IN THE NFL.
     
  10. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Steve Young says hello. :D
     
  11. joe king

    joe king Active Member

    Mobility is a good thing in a QB. It's been an asset going back to the days of Fran Tarkenton and Roger Staubach. It helps a good passer buy time for receivers to get open, not to mention the obvious of avoiding sacks.

    Making your quarterback an integral part of your running game is a good way to wind up with your backup QB playing a significant portion of the season.
     
  12. joe king

    joe king Active Member

    See above. Steve Young was a mobile quarterback, not a running quarterback. His career high in rushing attempts in a season was 76 -- less than five per game. And how many were designed runs?

    Last season, Griffin ran the ball 120 times. This season, through 13 games, he has run it 86 times -- and people are saying he's limited his running. Kaepernick had 63 rushing attempts last season and only started seven games. He has 78 through 13 games this season. Like Griffin, he's cut back on that part of his game, but, like Griffin, he's also been noticeably less effective.

    The trick is to use that mobility while limiting the exposure to risk that comes with a lot of designed runs, especially those of the sort that are likely to wind up with a hard hit.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page