1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sign of the Apocalypse at NYT - and it's not layoffs

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by ringer, Jan 31, 2009.

  1. ringer

    ringer Active Member

    Anyone else notice the NYT "story" on Kurt Warner's wife's hair in today's paper?

    What is going on with that section?

    It's been giving prominent space to absolute fluff lately (Super Bowl logos, towels...) but the wife's hair thing crossed the line.
     
    ringer, Jan 31, 2009
    #1
  2. Fenian_Bastard

    Fenian_Bastard Guest

    Is she looking even more, ah, manly these days?
     
    Fenian_Bastard, Jan 31, 2009
    #2
  3. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    When you've got a flock of people at the least inspiring/interesting Super Bowl in many years, you get desparate.
     
    spnited, Jan 31, 2009
    #3
  4. Pendleton

    Pendleton Member

    I'll admit to a bizarre fascination with Brenda Warner, but I wouldn't want that story in my sports section, or in the NY Times sports section.
     
    Pendleton, Jan 31, 2009
    #4
  5. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Is it worse than the story AP moved earlier this week about Tampa's 43 strip clubs?
     
    Batman, Jan 31, 2009
    #5
  6. I Digress

    I Digress Guest

    No one of the papers I read ran it too.. Long blond hair now.
     
    I Digress, Jan 31, 2009
    #6
  7. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    I don't get the NYT, but I saw this was in a blog.

    http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/whos-that-girl-its-the-quarterbacks-wife/?scp=1&sq=brenda%20warner&st=cse

    It ran in the paper too?
     
    imjustagirl, Jan 31, 2009
    #7
  8. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Seven kids? I'd have kept the short hair. Less maintenence.
     
    sportschick, Jan 31, 2009
    #8
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page