1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

SI story about Lance Armstrong. Doesn't look pretty.

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by novelist_wannabe, Jan 18, 2011.

  1. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    He can't sell magazines for them anymore so they finally decided to take him down.

    This guy has always been one of the biggest frauds in sports.

    It's sad, but anyone who didn't think this was inevitable was kidding themself.
     
  2. YGBFKM

    YGBFKM Guest

    Is he worse than Jay Cutler?
     
  3. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Much. He's a fraud.

    Cutler is genuine. A genuine prick, but genuine. :D
     
  4. flexmaster33

    flexmaster33 Well-Known Member

    Armstrong has denied any cheating for years and years...and yes, while cycling is among the dirtiest sports out there, it's little surprise that Armstrong has finally been caught in the web.
     
  5. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    WITCH HUNT!!!!!

    Novitzky is a renegade. He manufactured it all.
     
  6. YGBFKM

    YGBFKM Guest

    Cheating: Making cycling relevant since the invention of the wheel.
     
  7. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    If the headline of the SI story isn't "No Shit," I am going to be severely disappointed.
     
  8. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    That's funny. There's been a rumor for awhile that a Don Yaeger version of this story was killed by the SI editors several years ago during Lance's heyday.
     
  9. Piotr Rasputin

    Piotr Rasputin New Member

    What?

    I thought you were creamora.
     
  10. secretariat

    secretariat Active Member

    NO OUTING!!!!!
     
  11. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Does "The Case Against Lance Armstrong" break any news that wasn't covered in "The Case Against Lance" in the October issue of Men's Journal?

    http://www.mensjournal.com/october-2010-sneak-peak
     
  12. Shoeless Joe

    Shoeless Joe Active Member

    cheating = having a competitive advantage. Armstrong won on a level playing field.

    It's funny that the only people that seem shocked or upset that cyclists dope are non-cycling types. I know they do and don't give a shit.

    I'm a card-carrying (not really, but I do have a photo of myself interviewing him hanging in my house) Lance fanboy. I'm certain without a doubt he took PEDs. I can't prove that and neither could anyone testing him. I still so so what. When someone wants to throw Big Mig into the mix, and yes you LeMond you fucking piece of shit, then we can talk. Don't think think that PED use started with Riis.

    If you're on a soap box that cycling isn't a sport or you can't enjoy it because of PEDs, then you can't like the NFL or MLB, either.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page