1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Should obesity be a 'disease"

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Mar 3, 2014.

  1. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    My windshield's just as fogged-up as anyone's.
     
  2. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Listen up, oh obtuse one ... When you say that some such observed difference isn't that big -- and you preface that observation with a "fun with numbers" intro -- you should expect to have it pointed out to you that projecting that observed difference over a larger/longer scale might actually lead to real, substantive consequences. The degree to which that projection is valid is entirely another matter.
     
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    We also should note that the 7 percent is an average. That means that there are probably plenty of people who don't choose more calories. But that there is likely also a significant number who choose 15, 20, even 30 percent more calories if they are fatalistic about their weight.

    It reminds me of my dad with cigarettes. At some point, he convinced himself that, "It doesn't matter what you do," and he would cite every anecdote he had collected through the years of a non-smoker dying young. (Which he did, as well.)
     
  4. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I always love that one.

    Now they're "chasing" normal.

    What the hell was wrong with the "normal" they had before they ever tried the stuff?
     
  5. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    "Normal" meaning that the withdrawal symptoms are unbearable. Not "normal" meaning "high."
     
  6. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I think most people have something they struggle with.

    For some it's food/weight.
    For some it's alcohol.
    For some it's drugs.
    For some it's sex/fidelity.

    Calling any or all of them "diseases" just seems to justify the behavior and gives people an excuse to continue it.
     
  7. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Agreed. Maybe somewhere the study actually reports the choices of each participant and we see if it was skewed by a handful of participants.
     
  8. DeskMonkey1

    DeskMonkey1 Active Member

    Are we talking obesity in folks who eat too much and don't exercise or obesity in folks who have a medical condition that causes them to gain too much weight?
     
  9. Paynendearse

    Paynendearse Member

    It's got genetic reasons.
     
  10. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    There are people who can eat whatever they want and never gain a pound. There are people who work at it all the time and it will always be a struggle.

    You see it a lot with siblings. Two kids from the same parents and one will never have issues and one will...

    That's life... Calling it a disease would make me pretty uncomfortable though...
     
  11. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Will definitely help with more people getting on disability.
     
  12. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I'd compare that more to someone who struggles in school. With rare exceptions, I'd hesitate to call it a "disease." You may not ever be Albert Einstein, but if you work at it, you don't have to be a Sweathog, either. You may not be Brad Pitt, but if you work at it, you don't have to be Rerun, either.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page