1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should lengthy features be written with sub-headings?

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by smsu_scribe, Oct 30, 2009.

  1. See, this is what Jon Franklin says in his book, and I've never agreed with it. But if you're writing narrative and, theoretically, thinking cinematically, doesn't this go hand in hand? Movies and television shows don't flow from one scene to the next naturally. We don't have to watch Don Draper on the train all the way from Sterling Cooper to his dining room table. Is Matt Weiner using a "crutch"? Why any different for journalists?
     
  2. deskslave

    deskslave Active Member

    Because we all know that the desk won't give the story a good read if the writer doesn't set up a series of challenges for the desk to complete. Maybe you should include a secret code in the story, so that you know the desk is doing its job.

    Or maybe, just maybe, if you want subheads, you should put them in yourself, rather than foisting off your decisions on the desk.
     
  3. spaceman

    spaceman Active Member

    take that lengthy feature and chop it into a quick summary with some attitude, a nuggety notebook, and a top five list.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page