1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Shooting at LAX

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 1, 2013.

  1. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    And here's my conspiracy theory friend using unimportant details to make a case for it being a false flag:

    "The New York Post carried a bizarre graphic photo allegedly showing a wounded suspect at the airport. The photo contradicts a news report stating the “triggerman wore dark clothes and a bulletproof vest.” The individual in the photo is wearing a brown shirt and light-colored pants, not dark clothing. He is certainly not wearing a bullet proof vest. If the photo posted on the supposedly reputable New York Post website in fact shows the alleged shooter, then the earlier report is outright propaganda or shoddy journalism.

    Anybody who criticizes the government and its Gestapo operations in airports and on the streets of America is a terrorist who will shoot to kill government workers. This is the primary objective of the incident at LAX on Friday. Its end game is to portray activists opposed to the New World order agenda as mentally deranged cop killers."
     
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    He's a sovereign citizen, right?
     
  3. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    My friend? I don't know. Has some strange ideas, but not sure if he identifies with that group.
     
  4. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Nobody cares what your dingbat "friend" thinks.
     
  5. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    I thought you agreed with him.
     
  6. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    That's one of the many ways I am maligned here.
    I never fucking lined up with the fringe.
    I'm asking you and others to use a little inductive thinking.
    You presumably work in media - be critical.
     
  7. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    You haven't?
     
  8. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Of course I have. In several capacities.
    I asked you and Stinky to listen to the Newtown 911 tapes.
    Like a good crime reporter would fucking do.
    Why is there a movement afoot to get them shielded?
    Can you answer that for me?
     
  9. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    Why does anyone need to hear them? Maybe the parents don't want to hear about their kids being shot.
    It was a confusing scene and many of the initial accounts of what happened were proven wrong once everything was sorted out. I
    What happened in Newtown was simple. Somebody with mental problems went into the school and killed 26 people.
     
  10. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Let's be clear here.
    They are not asking for a categorical exclusion of all 911 audio tapes from the state's FOI Act.
    Just these ones.
     
  11. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    So what do you think they're hiding?
     
  12. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    I can't walk you fuckers through this stuff.
    You either see it or you don't.
    You either think like a child or think like a discerning adult.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page