1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Shiftless and lazy whites?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Drip, Apr 27, 2011.

  1. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Re: Shifless and lazy whites?

    I love how Backdoor Benny misspells the thread title.
     
  2. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    Whatcha talkin 'bout Willis? Looks like the title is spelled correctly to me.
     
  3. Care Bear

    Care Bear Guest

    I believe it's "Whatchu talkin 'bout, Willis?" Unless Gary Coleman had a shiftless and lazy white brother you were quoting.
     
  4. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    It was his shiftless and lazy white sister and father I was quoting. LOL
     
  5. Oggiedoggie

    Oggiedoggie Well-Known Member

    I blame automatic transmissions.
     
  6. Shoeless Joe

    Shoeless Joe Active Member

    I thought this was about the guy who lives across the street from me.
     
  7. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    Automaticy.
     
  8. Deeper_Background

    Deeper_Background Active Member

    Dont hate the playa W Post, hate the game! [​IMG]
     
  9. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    The irony of all of this is that the claim is being made by a "scholar," which is a polite way of saying, "A person who has spent a lifetime in academia and never worked a 'real' job in his life."
     
  10. Oggiedoggie

    Oggiedoggie Well-Known Member

    Not irony.
     
  11. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    What's a real job?
     
  12. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I don't get that.

    He makes money doing research, writing, and speaking. From what I can tell, he's never been on a public payroll or been on the dole.* (Though I suppose he received a stipend while he was in the Peace Corp.)

    Looks to me like he's earned his money.


    * And I should say that there would be nothing wrong with either of these either. But, even by stretching the definition, I don't see a problem.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page