Saw VI

Hostel might be one of the most disturbing big movies ever seen. The sequel was pretty bad.

They've never come close to the first Saw movie, but a couple of the sequels have been pretty solid. I didn't see the last one.

 

I haven't seen a Saw movie since III, which was pretty fucked up. I felt like I needed to get my brain scrubbed afterward.

My brother and I used to go just to see the gore and the horrible acting.

 

They made the first Saw movie for less than $1 million. I don't think any of them have cost more than $20 mil, which is pennies by Hollywood standards. They could make that money back even if they went straight to DVD.

 

The second one makes the first one look like "Bambi" -- OK, that's an exaggeration, but it's definitely the most fucked up wide release movie I can think of.

 

I thought Saw VI was the last in the series. Somewhere I heard they were only making six.

 

I've seen all of the Saws up to now.

I was by far the best.

III was the most gruesome.

II, IV and V were alright.

Will definitely see VI.

 

They're complete garbage after the first one.

And I know this from experience.

 

The first Hostel is scarier than the second one. The second one is much more graphic and violent.

 

Hostel! That's it! I was watching CSI: Miami last night and the crazy-ass bald dude from Hostel was a guest-star. I couldn't place it at the time.

 

I am not much of a gore fan and generally don't go for movies where someone is being tortured, maimed, terrorized, etc.

That being said I thought Saw was a reasonably interesting movie and more of a thriller than a gorefest. I had no intention of seeing it but they were playing it on the monitors on a bus I was on while travelling thru Cuba.

 

Some way of another, they need to bring back Danny Glover.

 

'Hostel' was laugh-out-loud bad.
I saw the first 'Saw' in the theater, and I actually thought it was alright - until the double or triple twist at the end. That ticked me off, and I have refused to watch any of the subsequent movies.