1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Santana trade official

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by BYH, Feb 1, 2008.

  1. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Since certain little people can't stand being iggied and must reply to people who hate their fucking guts and must try to renew battles they've already lost dozens of times, that thread got locked.

    So Santana is a Met. My stiffy subsides. :)
  2. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    That's a hell of a get for the Mets. And I'm among those who wasn't sure that the deal would get done in time.
  3. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    The deal was never not getting done. The Mets needed him and Santana had nowhere else to go. Maybe he won't get every cent he's seeking, but he's getting a lot more--guaranteed--by inking the deal right now as opposed to waiting and seeing.

    He's set for the next 10 generations and the union has its market-setting deal. All is well.
  4. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Yeah, all is well.

    Asshat. 8)
  5. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty Guest

    the mets still will suck donkey balls in hell.
  6. beefncheddar

    beefncheddar Guest

    Clearly an overreaction to the Phillies' acquisition of Pedro Feliz.
  7. Shaggy

    Shaggy Guest

    This obviously means the Royals have one less obstacle en route to the 2008 AL pennant.
  8. Rumpleforeskin

    Rumpleforeskin Active Member

    So the Mets still need two more starters and a bullpen.
  9. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    Dude, haven't you heard? Only the northeast matters.

    That's why Rudy's going to win the presidency. Just you wait and see.
  10. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    He's on the comeback trail. I wonder which is the worse number, proportionally, his dollars spent ($50 million) or 9/11 references (countless, really) to delegates (1).
  11. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty Guest

  12. BYH

    BYH Active Member

    He's the Moonlight Graham of presidential politics.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page