1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running SJ.com NCAA '11 online dynasty thread

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by RecentAZgrad, Jul 13, 2010.

  1. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    Az: Arizona
    Az bro 1: Colorado
    Az bro 2: Houston
    Simon: Maryland
    Meat: N.C. State, Virginia, Kentucky, Wake Forest and Louisville
    Hank: Nevada, CMU
    NUFan78: Washington State, Fresno State and San Diego State
    Jake: Baylor
    Hustle: UCLA
    Storm:
    Madhavok: Syracuse, Buffalo, Kentucky
    JoJo:
     
  2. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    One final question: we want to stay in our own leagues, not make one conference for all of us?
     
  3. RecentAZgrad

    RecentAZgrad Active Member

    I vote to stay in the conferences that the schools are in. Being in one conference would be too hectic.

    Version 1.0 of the rerated rosters is out: http://www.operationsports.com/forums/ncaa-football-rosters/426145-official-update-360-community-rosters-check-page-1-all-update-info-please.html. Fairdale Kings' rosters (which can be used in online play now) are also up.
     
  4. JakeandElwood

    JakeandElwood Well-Known Member

    If we all stay in one conference there will be no user national championship games and someone will have to go 3-9. Also it would take forever to get through a season, so I vote to keep doing it the way we have been.

    Have I mentioned that I love this game? So much better than '10.
     
  5. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    Yea, I'm in favor of staying in original conferences as well. Just threw it out there for discussion sake.

    And since no one has taken a WAC team, I might have a chance at a conference title with Nevada (or CMU, if I take them). I'm leaning heavily toward Nevada. I like that QB and I believe he's only a sophomore, I believe.
     
  6. JakeandElwood

    JakeandElwood Well-Known Member

    Ooh, nice. Get ready to run that pistol!
     
  7. JoJo

    JoJo Member

    My gamertag is Brentwood23 and I'll take Purdue.
     
  8. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    Yea now I just got to figure out HOW to do that. :D

    I don't know how great I've been at option-type offenses (recalling fun times with the option pick from NCAA 10). Although I guess the pistol really isn't an option.


    I toyed with the idea of taking Arizona State, but couldn't when I saw they were a B rating.
     
  9. JakeandElwood

    JakeandElwood Well-Known Member

    Yeah, Mizzou has the pistol and it's not an option thing so you don't have to worry about that.
     
  10. Simon

    Simon Active Member

    They do? I must be using the wrong playbook.
     
  11. Hustle

    Hustle Guest

    Agreed re: improvements to the game. Everything just feels much more realistic, and the movement is much more natural.

    One thing I don't like: There's no indication when someone gets injured. In my one-man online dynasty, I had to pause the game to go and find out that Evan Royster is out for 12 weeks with a broken collarbone. :mad:

    Not that I'm pissed off about that or anything.
     
  12. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    I noticed that too, Hustle.

    I did get an Erin Andrews injury update once, and I noticed there was a little message on the bottom of the screen for another one, but for the most part, there is no notification, which sucks.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page