1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Romney Suspending Campaign?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by EStreetJoe, Feb 7, 2008.

  1. Jesus_Muscatel

    Jesus_Muscatel Well-Known Member

    If it could help undo the eight-year abomination created by Ralph Nader's third-party candidacy in 2000, hell yeah, I'm all for it, too.
     
  2. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Every democrat in the country wants Mitt or Bloomberg to run as a third party candidate because it will guarantee a democratic win a la 1992...

    Bush doesn't win without Nader, but Bill Clinton doesn't win without Perot...
     
  3. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member


    Like a bad penny or cough, Nader and his monstrous ego continue to lurk.
     
  4. Chuck~Taylor

    Chuck~Taylor Active Member

    Good riddance. When a guy says things like he wouldn't want to put a Muslim in his cabinet because he believes it wouldn't help fight radical jihad, it kinda' contradicts the whole...you know...Constitution thing.

    It's also a very dangerous thing to say(the Muslim that's in the overseas who you're trying to convince Democracy is the right way listens to this shit too) because by saying statements like that, you're taking Al Qaeda's bait.
     
  5. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    I give Mitt a lot of credit for falling on his sword for the good of the party. The republicans will soon be ble to present a united front while the dems are still sluggin it out.
     
  6. Jesus, the zombie meme that will not die.
    Clinton wins an electoral landslide with or without Perot. Give GWB all of Perot's voters, and he wins one, maybe two more states, and none of the major ones. He also wins the popular vote as everu post-election survey showed Perot drawing equally from both sides, which was not the case with Nader, btw.
     
  7. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    It would be alot more troubling if he had actually said it.
     
  8. GB-Hack

    GB-Hack Active Member

    I think it's got something to do with that, and something to do with wanting to remain politically viable. The longer he stayed in and threw mud, the more chance he'd be the guy who derailed McCain's chances.

    I'm not sure which percentage to allott to either side though. Probably more to keep himself viable for future positions.
     
  9. Football_Bat

    Football_Bat Well-Known Member

    So this assures — barring a Huck miracle — that our next president will be a sitting senator.
     
  10. Chuck~Taylor

    Chuck~Taylor Active Member

    http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/7059.html
     
  11. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    Read carefully
     
  12. D.Sanchez

    D.Sanchez Member

    Did you actually read that?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page