1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

RIP Stan Musial

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Gehrig, Jan 19, 2013.

  1. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    RIP


     
  2. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Go back and look at Musial's numbers and put up 'em next to Williams'. No significant difference. Williams was just better (maybe nobody has ever been better) at attracting attention.
    It's sad that he has passed, but a life in full indeed.
     
  3. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    Simply the greatest St. Louis Cardinal ever, and that's a mighty strong field.
     
  4. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    R.I.P. to the best ambassador for St. Louis. The stats speak for themselves. The actions he took to help major league integration along are a less-told story.
     
  5. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Think before you type.

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/musiast01.shtml

    http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/w/willite01.shtml
     
  6. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Age 92? Gosh, didn't realize he was THAT old. Maybe the greatest St. Louis Cardinal of all-time (although Bob Gibson and Ozzie Smith might argue).
     
  7. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    And if Bob Gibson or Ozzie Smith argued, they'd be wrong. The heir apparent was Pujols, but he left.
     
  8. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Hit between .310 and .376 for the first 16 years of his career.

    Second in career total bases (6,134).

    All the stats: http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/musiast01.shtml
     
  9. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Ruckus, what's the difference? In the context of baseball games played by nine man teams, how is one of those sets of stats going to win more games than the other, or contribute to winning more games than the other? It was the opinion of all of baseball in those days that these two men were equals. That opinion is correct.
     
  10. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Buh, buh...calculator!
     
  11. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    No, it's not.

    Musial's slash line was 331/417/559.

    Williams' was 344/482/634.

    Big advantage Williams in all categories.

    Musial's OPS was 975. Williams' was 1116. That's almost 150 points difference. That is massive.

    Musial's OPS+ was 159; Williams' was 190.

    The only advantage Musial has is titles (thanks to Williams going up against the Yankee juggernaut his entire career) and some counting stats, by virtue of almost 800 more career games. And Williams still had more home runs, almost as many RBI and 500 more walks. And Williams lost five seasons serving his country. You can't ding him for that.

    It's not even an argument. Musial is one of the best players ever. But he's not better than Williams.
     
  12. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Decent year in '46:

    702 PA
    624 AB
    124 runs
    228 hits
    50 doubles
    20 triples
    16 homers
    103 RBIs
    73 walks
    31 strikeouts
    .365 average
    .434 OBP
    1.021 OPS
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page