1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Recency Bias working against beauty in the past??

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by qtlaw, Feb 6, 2020.

  1. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    I saw this and realized I forgot how striking she was [​IMG]
    Wow was she beautiful.
     
  2. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

  3. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

  4. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Harvey Weinstein woulda raped her.
     
  5. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

  6. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    Who is that? I don't find her attractive. Rita Hayworth is a different story.
     
  7. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Ava Gardner, I believe.
     
  8. lantaur

    lantaur Well-Known Member

    Recency bias affects pretty much everything people have an opinion about. That being said .. Grace Kelly.
     
    swingline and justgladtobehere like this.
  9. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    Yeah, she's timeless.
     
    swingline likes this.
  10. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Grace Kelly, Natalie Wood. Timeless, incredible beauties.
    This woman in the first picture, Ava Gardner? Heck no.
     
  11. Scout

    Scout Well-Known Member

  12. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    I mean she’s not ugly. But unless she had the body of Emily Ratakowski, she wouldn’t turn my head
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page