1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Press association files suit over photo policy

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Inky_Wretch, Nov 5, 2007.

  1. Most state high school associations are private entities, but they probably fall under that "quasi-governmental" category. That makes them different from, say, NASCAR.

    The press association should fight this thing tooth and nail.
     
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    The problem I have is some state associations are now claiming copyright ownership of all photos and video taken at postseason events. Write a policy that expressly forbids selling the photos, but don't try to claim you own the photos.
     
  3. Idaho

    Idaho Active Member

    Can newspapers sell unpublished prints from NFL, MLB or NBA games?

    Do pro athletes get a cut of reprint sales? If so, should amateur athletes get a cut from the profits of their image?

    Just askin'
     
  4. novelist_wannabe

    novelist_wannabe Well-Known Member

    This also raises some interesting conflict of interest questions. To wit: If we're selling reprints and the association is also selling pictures, how might that competition impact our news judgement regarding the association? I'm not saying it will or it won't but it's worth asking.
     
  5. Toby Carrig

    Toby Carrig Member

    The Great Plains region has discussed this topic at recent APSE functions, and the word from legal counsel is that the court fight would not be successful. I don't know if that means newspapers shouldn't have it in the arsenal in efforts to reach some compromise, along with newspapers independently making decisions on whether these policies by high school associations will affect coverage decisions.
    In Missouri, MSHSAA snuck in wording on the credential forms a few years back: "Any secondary use of any picture, audio description, videotape/film or drawing of the event taken or made by an accredited agency or individual to whom a credential has been issued (including, but not limited to, use in delayed editorial or noneditorial, advertising, sales promotion or merchandising) is strictly prohibited."
    Knowing there were growing concerns about the issue this summer, they reworded their credential: "Advance consent from the MSHSAA is required for any secondary use of any picture, audio description or videotape/film of the event taken or made by an accredited media agency or individual to whom a credential has been issued (including, but not limited to sales promotion or merchandising)."
    MSHSAA is one of those associations that has contracted with a company that takes action photos and the awards ceremonies and sells those photos to parents and whomever. Their goal is to protect that business relationship.
    This year, MSHSAA also formed a media advisory committee (something Illinois has had for many years) which eventually may help work on some policy decisions in this area.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page