1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

  2. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    How hard is it to comprehend less money in, less money out? You'd think that rational people/voters [major assumption in Economics] would realize tax cuts to the rich and corps mean less for everyone else.
  3. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    (psst .... i think he was making a joke .... psst)
    2muchcoffeeman likes this.
  4. Fly

    Fly Well-Known Member

  5. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  6. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    Sorry wasn't talking about 2muchcoffeeman but more his post about the WH admitting cuts needed.
  7. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Nah, this isn't creepy at all.

  8. Slacker

    Slacker Well-Known Member

  9. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    One of the most noteworthy things about the Kavenaugh deal is how few of his defender talking heads have followed his own line of straightforward denial. Instead we get these weird "well, he was only 17" or the insane "it was rough horseplay" lines of argument. It suggests very few Republicans have much confidence in his denial.
  10. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  11. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

  12. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Charles Grassley (and Hatch, and Feinstein, and others) is proof the Senate is basically the world's fanciest assisted living facility. I?'m 68, but really, the US ought to have at least an age 80 cutoff for elected and appointed officials. Yeah, I know that means Ginsburg would go, but if enacted, let the old fucks select their replacements subject to election/confirmation.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page