President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Do you think the republicans in the Senate will actually refuse to seat him? No chance of that refusal.
By having put their financial resources into the race after seeing the peril of abstinence, they're made it clear they want him in there. Attempting to block his formal entry into the fold will simply get them sued. . If history is a guide, the issue will take several months to be resolved in the courts. They won't stand for that. They've made it clear that they want a possible pedophile in their midst because he'll deliver the votes they want. All the while, they'll claim to be the one and only party of true American, Christian values, and they've created the gerrymandered infrastructure to ensure they never lose power.
They won't mess with that.

 

Yes, I think they'll keep him from caucusing, etc. if he is seated. I guess I should amend and say good chance he doesn't serve near a full term.

 

McConnell already campaigned against him. He'd be anything but a dependable vote. Your rant doesn't hold water.

 

Yes, if you're willfully obtuse and disingenuous, they are exactly the same.

 

You mean the Mitch McConnell who, after saying he'd oppose Moore's presence, now says he'll let the people of Alabama decide? That Mitch McConnell?

A year ago, several republicans claimed moral outrage over the Access Hollywood tape. Intolerable, they said. Enough to compel them to rescind support.
Then Trump wins and what do they do? They pretend the guy wearing their uniform is just like any other official. They wrap their arms around bigots like Franklin Graham and Jerry Falwell and Trump in a group hug. And they will do it again with Moore, who lest we forget, says Muslims shouldn't be allowed to serve in Congress.

 

Technically, I don't believe they can refuse to seat him. They can just expel him after he is seated.

 

But emails, careless with classified information, what is she hiding, lock her up, etc.

 

Forget it, Jake, he's Chlamydia.

 

I'm not sure I understand why you quoted yourself on this post. I wasn't questioning, countering or even casting doubt upon your post. Just questioning Junior's claim of attorney/client privilege - which may or may not be legitimate depending upon who was in the room.

 

Many sides, right!

No. One side is getting rid of sexual abusers. The other side is looking the other way.

 

Same reason they interview LaVar Ball, people watch this stupidity and they make money.

 

Meh, he found a way to make a good living off of stupid people, much like Clay Travis. I admire his hustle.