1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    If Mitch tries to ram through a replacement before the election, it’s a tacit admission that he expects Twitchy to get drubbed.

    I think his play will be to move carefully at first — get the pick from Twitchy and lay the groundwork behind the scenes — and then make the big push in the lame duck.
     
  2. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

    Currently, we have the Worst Wing.

     
  3. Jake from State Farm

    Jake from State Farm Well-Known Member

  4. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    In external politics, that is, among us voters, that's the play. But in internal Senate politics, that'd be just the thing to have a Democratic majority, if such exists, to react by packing the courts.
     
  5. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  6. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Agreed on regional differences. There are Trumpist parts of every state. But because of the *%^%& Electoral College, every state's collective vote sticks at least a bit to every citizen in the eyes of outsiders. That certainly wouldn't happen if we didn't have such an undemocratic, absurd, slavery-inspired system as the Electoral College, which is one of the very few colleges that Trumpists like.
     
    I Should Coco likes this.
  7. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    If Trump gets re-elected and he gets even more perverse with the passage of time, I won't be shocked to hear him just let it all go at some point in the second term.
     
  8. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

  9. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    In that case, Mitch will be banking on the hope that court-packing will be seen as it was in 1937 — as an overreach in the other direction by the Dems — and he'll be back in the majority in 2022. That's all he really cares about.

    The best play of all, of course, is for the Dems to throw up every procedural roadblock possible and run out the clock.
     
  10. Tarheel316

    Tarheel316 Well-Known Member

    Damn right.
     
  11. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    That was less than a half-assed campaign in 2014. That was an arrogant/I've got this wrapped up campaign. Udall, a five-term congressman and sitting senator from the Front Range. No way he's going to lose to some clown hick from tiny-town and -- gasp!-- rural Yuma. It was a one-note campaign that didn't register, especially in the suburbs of JeffCo and elsewhere. They called that race several hours before Hick's win for re-election as governor over Bob Beauprez -- and Hick won by more than 3%.

    Gardner today didn't answer a direct question about the SCOTUS situation.

    Again, they don't control what votes are brought to the Senate. They can say, like Collins did, no vote should be held. No doubt McConnell knows how to play this. And likely a way we all aren't thinking about.
     
  12. Tarheel316

    Tarheel316 Well-Known Member

    It’s different than 1937. The Court is much more of a political entity now, kind of like a super legislature. And very dangerous with radical libertarian Republicans controlling it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page