1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Driftwood

    Driftwood Well-Known Member

    I don't know a ton about Bloomberg, but he might be a game changer.
    He would probably be acceptable to middle of the road older voters who deep down know Trump is trash but won't vote for a front running D.
    He's an alternative to those who would take Biden over Trump but none of the rest.
     
  2. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  3. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    But there are already a dozen alternatives to Biden in the field who aren't as far to the left as Sanders and Warren. It's November. Iowa and New Hampshire are in three months. Bloomberg has no organization nor any active supporters now. All he has, and I'll admit he has a lot of it, is money to spend on TV ads. Living in a market where Tom Steyer runs an ad on every station every hour at least, I don't know how effective a weapon that is.
    Last but not least, every NYC Mayor or former Mayor who has run for President has lost in humiliating fashion. John Lindsay in 1972, Rudy in 2008 and hell, deBlasio just this year.
     
  4. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

  5. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Preface to say that I think that Mike Bloomberg, the politician, is a putz -- it's his ego and hubris. Mike Bloomberg, the man, is not. He is a very smart, very serious person when it comes to business, at least. I always got the feeling he ran for mayor of NY, because he heard the mayor can go to all the good parties, and he was looking for that at that point in his life.

    A few things about what you said. ... If Bloomberg enters, he won't be playing around. This isn't Howard Schultz or Tom Steyer, in a number of ways. First, they are actually pretty poor monetarily compared to Bloomberg. Bloomberg is one of only 5 or 6 people in the U.S. for whom a self-funded presidential race would be chump change. Bloomberg can easily sit still, let the field of candidates spend millions of dollars trying to win Iowa and New Hampshire and South Carolina and blow through their wads, and then mosey on in, in time to run in some of the states that allow independents to vote in the primaries. And he can spend what it would take without blinking an eye. Schultz was not willing to spend that way, and on top of it, he couldn't take the criticism. ... something Bloomberg will do, and roll his eyes like he is above Elizabeth Warren, before doing his best, "I am the moderate voice of reason" pitch. He will also be able to get the message across that you don't make poor people rich by making rich people poorer, way better than those others are able to, because they fall into the trap of apologizing for their wealth. My sense is that is because Bloomberg doesn't try to do the "man of the people" thing, he doesn't seem phony, and at their heart, the majority of people don't think success is bad.

    Where Bloomberg has his problems is that he's a short, old Jewish man (although he won't come across as old as Biden, I think), which maybe can be OK in the democratic primary, but I am not sure how that is ready to play in a general election. Minorities will never warm to him; just ain't happening. And in fact, he's just not a warm person at all, which won't play well in national politics for him. He is aloof.

    He may have actually done better running as an independent. But he is such a meticulous person, and has a polling operation that is supposedly ridiculously good, so if he is running as a Democrat, he is cleary seeing that 1) There is a big swath of Democrats who are turned off by Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders and not happy, and 2) Joe Biden is sinking and doesn't provide that alternative, and Mayor Pete ain't making enough inroads.

    The calculation would be that he could swoop in and be that candidate.
     
    Elliotte Friedman likes this.
  6. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Bloomberg is a highly accomplished person. Serious, like Ragu says. But he has no constituency within the Democratic Party at all. There's no evidence that Biden is sinking beyond the fact he's not a very good campaigner. He still leads all polls, just not by as much as he used to. It is a mistake, I think, to see Biden's supporters as "moderates." I believe he represents the idea of an Obama restoration. As Dave Weigel pointed out, the Democrats have NEVER had an ex-President universally popular within their party until now. Obama will remain quiet, but he still casts a long shadow, and that shadow is Biden's protection.
     
  7. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    PS: If anything, Bloomberg could serve as Biden's foil to show "see, I'm more liberal than Bernie and Liz think!"
     
  8. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    1) Obama's shadow wasn't big enough to cover Hillary Clinton's warts. ...against Donald Trump, where you'd think any amount of that shadow would have made a difference. If Biden keeps fumbling, and he is going to, there is no shadow in the world he can hide under.
    2) You are right. Bloomberg is not one of them. He's been a Democrat, Republican, Independent. And *gasp* he is a Billio(wait, that's a dirty word)! But not being one of the Democrats is only a hindrance if you need to raise a ton of money. So no big deal for him. He just needs to get his name on the ballots (it's already done), and then score well enough in 10 to 15 of the states that allow independents to vote in the primary in order to build momentum. I'm not saying it is going to happen, but it COULD happen. Don't forget, Donald Trump was not one of the Republicans. They wanted Jeb Bush or Marco Rubio. But the actual voters had different ideas.
     
  9. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Hillary ran from Obama in a lot of states. She made the same mistake Al Gore did in 2000.

    Biden, or whomever, is all but certain to embrace Obama, if only to increase black turnout.
     
  10. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Nate Silver points out that way back in late 2018-early 19, when none of the candidates had yet announced, polls included Bloomberg and he drew like 2-3 percent. I just don't see it. As an independent, he could get 5-6 percent of the vote and re-elect Trump. As a Democrat, he'll be just another also-ran.
    PS: Silver also just noted that Bloomberg's intention to wholly self-fund means he cannot qualify for ANY Democratic debates as the DNC standards include a minimum number of donors. He's left with nothing but TV ads.
     
    Neutral Corner likes this.
  11. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    On every poll I have posted for voting, I have picked her. Many of the Democratic candidates are truly useless, Biden is Namath with the Rams, and Sanders is a crud. (Tho an honest one._

    So there's Warren...and there' Pete. And Pete's looking better to me every day. Warren isn't as good when she's in the lead. She's not an underdog; the exasperated sighs and chip-on-her-shoulder snark doesn't befit the leader of a race.

    There's still a real chance Hilary walks into this race, and I'd probably vote for her. Kinda like her and always have.
     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Could be right. I am talking about just getting the nomination, not the general election. Hillary Clinton had black voters. At least in the primaries, where it made a big difference, because black people didn't get Bernie Sanders at all. Maybe she didn't inspire enough of them to vote in the general election, and it cost her. I am not sure Biden will do much better, but maybe I am wrong. If he does, I think it'll be more about Donald Trump inspiring more people to vote. ... against him.

    I hate generalizing and treating a race like it does things in lockstep, but my guess would be that Biden will get a decent number of black people's votes in the primary. I will also make an educated guess that that will not be an area of strength for Mike Bloomberg, if he is in. Bloomberg really needs to tap into a surge in people who think of themselves as more independent, moderate-minded (whatever that means) democrats (or actual independents), if he is going to have any success. I suspect he has been doing work that tells him those people exist and are looking for someone. If he enters, guess we'll see if that is true and it is right.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page