1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Patrick Kane rape investigation dropped by DA

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Nov 5, 2015.

Page 8 of 8
  1. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Price does interview Kane's friend who was at the house. He said she was there for 25 minutes and she and Kane were alone together no more than two minutes.
     
    Dick Whitman, Mar 13, 2016
    #85
  2. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    Dickie how would you handle this differently if you were counselor for the alleged victim?
     
    cjericho, Mar 13, 2016
    #86
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    I would not have held a press conference alleging evidence had been tampered with. I'd start there.
     
    Dick Whitman, Mar 13, 2016
    #87
  4. KJIM

    KJIM Well-Known Member

    I'm no attorney and only opened this thread today for the first time so I've no clue to the griping, but I see a big difference in
    The bite marks were caused by Kane.
    and
    Kane likely caused the bite marks.
     
    KJIM, Mar 13, 2016
    #88
  5. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    Umm. Yeah the difference is you can't say "the bite marks were caused by Kane" unless there is proof.
     
    cjericho, Mar 13, 2016
    #89
Page 8 of 8
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page