1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Orange County Register deadline change

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Mr. X, Oct 5, 2014.

  1. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    Disagree. Incomplete results just draw attention to the problem with the medium.
     
  2. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    Don't think we're fooling too many people with the problem of the medium.

    We'll keep doing it that way.
     
  3. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Customer service telling "lies."

    http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2014/10/oc_reg_customer_service_rep.php

    LAT lawsuit says OCR is keeping tips that were designated for delivery people.

    http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2014/10/aaron_kushner_lawsuit_la_times.php
     
  4. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    "Saturday's game ended too late for the print edition" and "UCLA led Arizona 15-13 after three quarters" seem like six of one, a half-dozen of the other to me. Both draw attention to the fact that the result is not here, although I have to say I've never worked at a place where a partial result was acceptable.

    Only difference is, 20 years ago it was done as an explanation so people wouldn't call in and ask where the result was. Today it is done to send them to your online product.
     
  5. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    Which we do. We refer them to the website for final score and details.
     
  6. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    Yes, I'm sure people visit your newspaper website rather than ESPN to get a score. That's very effective.
     
  7. boundforboston

    boundforboston Well-Known Member

    So what's the solution if they don't? Visit ESPN for a score? Not bother posting information on your website and don't bother with online refers?
     
  8. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    There is plenty of opportunity to get people to your website from the print product. The score of a major college football game on the other side of the country is not one. I'm not even saying you shouldn't point out that the scores are there, just that no one is following through.
     
  9. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    That's not what you're even saying? It sure SOUNDED like that's what you were even saying. :)
     
  10. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    FWIW, the great majority of "go to website for results" refers are for the early edition and typically involve state/local teams or events. We had a NASCAR race in our backyard last week that ended 2 hours after our early edition deadline. So we sent those people online, where they could read a half-dozen staff-produced stories from the race. An an east coast product, we would never publish a specific "go to website for result" refer for some Pac-12 game on the West Coast.
     
  11. steveu

    steveu Well-Known Member

    The St. Louis and San Francisco papers held back deadlines for baseball, and I'm sure Kansas City and Baltimore did as well.

    With this new deadline change, OCR is lucky Angels and Dodgers didn't go deep into the postseason. Although the deadlines may not have been much of a factor anyway, I guess...
     
  12. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    I just don't understand what is gained from telling readers the third-quarter score of a game that ended eight hours before readers pick up the paper. And online refers should be to specific, exclusive content or they're just wasting space.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page