1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Online Editor for KUsports.com (Lawrence, Ks.)

Discussion in 'Journalism Jobs' started by Jay Sherman, Jun 25, 2008.

  1. Jay Sherman

    Jay Sherman Member

    From JJobs:

  2. Jay Sherman

    Jay Sherman Member

  3. writing irish

    writing irish Active Member

  4. mustangj17

    mustangj17 Active Member

    Is this like a rivals/scout type site, or is this the official Kansas sports website?
  5. BigSleeper

    BigSleeper Active Member

    I think it's a very legit site and very respected in the industry, IIRC. Probably a good gig whoever gets it.
  6. Oggiedoggie

    Oggiedoggie Well-Known Member

    It's owned by the Lawrence Journal-World (that's World-Journal for some of you), but I'm not sure what the working arrangement is.
  7. mustangj17

    mustangj17 Active Member

    Yeah, I was thrown off by the KUsports.com title. I just checked it out. Definitely legit.
  8. Jay Sherman

    Jay Sherman Member

    I thought it was just their CSTV site, i.e. UMTerps.com or MGoBlue.com, but it looks pretty good and independent.
  9. SCEditor

    SCEditor Active Member

    It really is a fantastic site. It's probably one of the best college sports sites run by a newspaper in the country. They do a fantastic job with it.
  10. MU_was_not_so_hard

    MU_was_not_so_hard Active Member

    Certainly a credible, journalistic site.
    And certainly in a cool part of the country.

    Unrelated -- gotta love the ads for KU ringtones at the bottom of the this page.
  11. Yeah, it's legit. The site run by the Jayhawks is www.kuathletics.com

    And interestingly enough, I've got an ad for K-State ringtones now.
  12. MU_was_not_so_hard

    MU_was_not_so_hard Active Member

    And let me add, there are a fair number of papers trying to copy this method, whether they know it or not.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page