1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

obviously i'll have something to say about this...

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by jason_whitlock, May 9, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    I'm hardly jealous, the man has earned what he's got for good reason. I love most of his columns. I won't ever be known like Whitlock and I'm fine with that. But he took advantage of that situation to get TV appearances on CNN and then Oprah.

    p.s. I love how when someone disagrees with Whitlock or someone like him, someone immediately calls it jealousy. Nevermind that some of us might have different opinions of the same situations. Why can't someone just not like a column?
     
  2. Twoback

    Twoback Active Member

    The way Gene put it, it was "African-American." Not sure if those were Rhoden's words, or not.
    But it was a ludicrous statement, regardless.
    Rhoden's contention that teams look around the world for talent in order to make the league whiter is not only offensive, it's ignorant. If he wants to criticize the league for contributing to a culture that is diminishing the development of young African-American basketball players, cool. Because it is/has. But teams look overseas for players to get the best players they can, and that has included many players of different races (Barbosa, Diaw, Parker, Yao).
     
  3. boots

    boots New Member

    For years, there has been a theory that people don't want to pay to see an all-black NBA. When the Knickerbockers fielded an all-black team, they were called the Niggerbockers.
     
  4. GB-Hack

    GB-Hack Active Member

    And what year was that? 1965?

    I don't think the color of the teams skin matters to fans for the most part. They care more that they win and don't get arrested when they hit the town.
     
  5. slappy4428

    slappy4428 Active Member

    Edited for brevity.
     
  6. boots

    boots New Member

    Try as late as 1985.
     
  7. Twoback

    Twoback Active Member

    Not the first time in my career that's happened.
     
  8. chazp

    chazp Active Member

    Wojo nailed it when he offered why it may not change in the next few years...
    It isn't easy out there. The entry-level pay stinks. The hours are insane. The travel is gruesome. The deadlines age you. The demands ruin marriages. The athletes can be anywhere from engaging to insufferable. More leagues and teams are trying to control the message. There are ethical land mines. And did I mention life-threatening press box food?
    I've never seen our industry put in a nutshell in one graph until now.
     
  9. GB-Hack

    GB-Hack Active Member

    Ok, still 22 years ago. I think we've come a lot further since then.
     
  10. boots

    boots New Member

    In some ways yes. In some ways no.
     
  11. GB-Hack

    GB-Hack Active Member

    But the overriding point is this. If Bill Rhoden thinks that in 18 years we're going to see an NBA with no African American's playing in it, when currently I think the figure is around 80-85%, he's seriously delusional.
     
  12. alleyallen

    alleyallen Guest

    Just one innocent question for Whitlock...

    If this isn't about you, then why start a thread saying, "I'll have something to say about this..." until you, y'know, actually have something to say?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page