1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Obfuscating language

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Buck, Sep 8, 2015.

  1. Bronco77

    Bronco77 Well-Known Member

    Four more irritating expressions:

    "Going forward" (as in, "The franchise expects higher attendance going forward")
    "At the end of the day" (unless something really did take place at the end of the day)
    "Best practices" (one of the worst bizspeak phrases I know of and all too often used to describe cost-cutting strategies -- but OK in a sports context if we're writing, "The Bulldogs had one of their best practices")
    "Rightsizing" (awful euphemism for downsizing, which is bad enough)
     
  2. doctorx

    doctorx Member

    "As we first told you on Eyewitnessactionnewschannel..."
     
  3. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    Hey, if you're going to start talking about the business world, there isn't enough room on the Internet for that list.
     
  4. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    ESPN is the all-time king of this, no?
     
  5. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    I love this. I work in the business world now and one of the words that drives me most nuts -- and is used most often -- is "utilize." It means "use." I change that every time. I recently told one of the biz-types I work with if they ever see the word "utilize" in one of my publications, it's a proofing mistake, because if I see it, it will be gone.

    We once ran a story in which an industry expert said of some of her clients, "They’re not really sure they want to do this kind of stuff.” When I sent the edited version to the writer for approval, she wrote back, "Is there anyway to rewrite this sentence so it doesn’t say 'stuff'? ... It just sounds so dumb."

    My response was, "It doesn't sound dumb at all. It sounds like the way people actually talk."

    I'm happy to say the final version ran complete with the word "stuff."
     
  6. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    "Leverage" as a verb
    "Solution," meaning a product or service
     
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2015
  7. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    I love the word 'stuff.'

    It gets axed all the time.
     
  8. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    My next sentence after the ones in the previous post was, "Full disclosure: Stuff is one of my favorite words of all time."
     
  9. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    I'm guilty of using a lot of lingo and biz-speak or marketing-speak for in-house communications.
    I admit it.

    But I try to hunt those things down and kill them when it comes to external communications.

    Sadly, I don't always have the final say on it, though.
     
  10. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    One of the beauties of my job is I'm in charge of most of our external communication, including our monthly magazines, so I do get the final say (with a few exceptions).

    One thing I've noticed, thankfully, is that "paradigm" no longer seems to be one of the hot business buzzwords.
     
  11. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    "Stakeholders."
     
    HC likes this.
  12. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    I worked a brief stint where I thought I had final say, but discovered that was not the way it was going to work.
    I left there.

    Now I'm in a position where I knew coming in that I didn't have final say.
    Much easier to deal with the situation when all the cards were put on the table during the hiring process.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page