NL MVP Thread

I know. I was just kidding. I would have included one of those little smiley faces, but I hate them.

 

Holliday had a marvelous year. I could have easily built a case for him, but as I wrote on here a month or so ago, I believe Rollins was the MVP for what he did for his team -- offensively, defensively and in terms of leadership, too.

You can disagree, but to call this a travesty and rip the voters is totally ridiculous.

 

Nothing wrong with a good close vote.

Too bad when it is so close (5 percent of the vote) that they just don't call it a Co-MVP.

 

It's also too bad they keep score during games... What is this fucking T-league!

 

I wasn't sure. I just wanted the excuse to point out that he's probably going to avoid this thread. That or he'll come on here and argue about what he really meant until his fingers bleed.

 

hahahahahaha

I guess I deserved that one.

When you have that many votes and points, to lose by .001 percent is a little tough to swallow. I would think the definition of what tie is could be expanded.

 

Everybody is a winner!!!!

 

So I guess the dictionary should change their definition of a tie as well?

 

A guy excelling at the most difficult position on the diamond maybe?

I think it would have been a significant misstep if Holliday had won.

Baseball writers have done as good a job as I can remember from the LCS MVPs though the league MVPs in a season.

 

Agreed... c'mon.

 

93 would wreak havoc at the Olympic 100 competitions....

 

But this is a subjective vote.