1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NBA Finals 1, Delivery Room 0

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by shotglass, Jun 6, 2007.

  1. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Then don't have kids.

    If you are too young to be married, then you are too young to decide to have kids.
     
  2. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Nobody bitches that Brangilina isn't married.

    Nobody bitches that Matt Leinart and Tom Brady can't even be bothered to continue dating women they knocked up.

    But its "OMG think of the children" when LeBron and his partner choose to have babies while in a committed relationship, but choose to not marry.

    Being married is no guarantee of a loving, committed relationship, nor is it a guarantee of good parenting.
     
  3. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Says who?

    You?
     
  4. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Well ... a lot of people say that, Zeke. It's the nature of debate.

    But you seem awfully anxious to throw the nuclear family under the bus. It hasn't worked for the Western world?
     
  5. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    Who says "out of wedlock"?

    Seriously.

    And shotty, that would make some kind of sense if I was arguing that no one should get married, ever.

    Since I'm not, it doesn't compute.
     
  6. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Second kid.

    Pitt and Angelina are freaks.

    Brady and Matt are sitting at one each, and yes, they are at fault, but they did not do it twice.
     
  7. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    Again, LeBron and partner are already in a committed relationship. How does marriage change that?

    You are trying to apply your morals to other people, and what works for you and your ilk doesn't necessarily work for the rest of the world.
     
  8. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Guess LeBron won't have to worry about missing Game 4. He's got a second son -- Bryce Maximus James.

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/basketball/nba/specials/playoffs/2007/06/14/lebron.baby.ap/index.html
     
  9. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    And the irony is he was worried about missing Game 5 -- which probably won't exist!
     
  10. amraeder

    amraeder Well-Known Member

    Win one for Bryce Maximus!
     
  11. KP

    KP Active Member

    Shouldn't the score on the thread changing seeing that LeBron was in the room?
     
  12. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    You're right, it probably should.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page