MSNBC Suspends Ed Schultz Over "Slut" Remark

As usual, Starman can't simply point out an area of disagreement with someone on the right, he has to resort to character assassination.

Ed Schultz gets suspended by MSNBC for calling Laura Ingraham a slut, but Starman calls herthe "C" word and there's not a single peep -- not even from any of the boards "feminists".

MSNBC is running an ad with Chris Matthews where he says this:

“You know, one of the things that I think we are going to see in the 2012 presidential election, is whether one of the Republicans stands up and says, ‘I disagree with Obama on taxes, the size of government and some foreign policy issues, but he’s as much an American as I am. And you know what the problem with this election, 2012, is? They won’t say that. They oughta just say, he’s as much of an American as I am. Let’s move on to the issues.”

Because liberals always see the attacks against them as unfair.

Matthews should open his eyes and look at his side. He should also look in the mirror.

As to Ingraham, can someone spell out their beef with her?

She's smart; undergrad at Princeton, JD from UVa. She clerked for an appellate judge and a Supreme Court Justica.

She's a cancer survivor.

She's adopted two children, one from Guatemala and one from Russia.

She's extremely close with her openly gay brother.

So, she's hardly a right wing nut. Seems to me she's living a life that liberals should be proud of.

 

I've listened to her show. She's a sanctimonious hypocritical cu.nt.

And if the feminists or the pansy-ass pussy liberals or anybody else don't like the verbiage, they can kiss my ass. You want to step in the ring, make sure your gloves are laced up.

 

For example?

And, really, what's it take to earn a vacation from SportsJournalists.com? A lot more than at MSNBC apparently.

Let's call George W. Bush a mongrel. Let's call Laura Ingraham the "C" word. Nobody cares -- especially if it's Starman, because, well, that's just Starman being Starman.