Monica Lewinsky back in the news

More evidence that this story is Clinton driven to clear the deck for 2016.

NOW's inaction during that entire time has forever scarred them as
a serious spokes group for women's rights in the workplace.

 

I didn't say it was.

 

Everyone in the US is a subordinate to the president, no?

Monica needs the cash. So she has her agent call some magazines to see who is interested, sells her story, gets 15 more minutes of fame, and becomes the Kay Summersby of her generation. No big deal.

 

Clinton's bj has historically been the mother's milk of SportsJournalists.com.

 

The Clintons need put this behind them as an issue for 2016. One
of their minions calls Monica and proposes story done by favorable
ex staffer for cash is more like it.

 

With long form being the new mother's milk.

 

Does everyone work for the President?

And, Monica could have monetized her affair long ago, for a lot more money.

 

Everyone in the US is not a White House employee, no.

 

She's the victim here. Stop the slut shaming. It is very unbecoming. Monica Lewinsky is the victim. To paint her as a villain or a slut or a schemer is to dip into some very ugly gender history in this country. And it also, from a political standpoint, is a sacrificing of the high ground in conversations about gender. You don't get a slut-shame-for-free card by declaring yourself pro-choice.

 

The next President Clinton won't get a BJ in the office, I think we can be pretty sure about that.

A generation later and the tin-foil hatters are still looking for a straw man (Bill Clinton got a BJ so we can't trust Hillary!) because the alternatives they offer are so out of touch with the mainstream they can't possibly win.

 

The Clinton WH, with Hillary in the lead, ran a war on women. That's the truth, and that's what Hillary has to answer for.

 

No, she doesn't.