1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

MLB, can of worms, salary cap, dead horse

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by 2muchcoffeeman, Jan 15, 2009.

  1. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    Mr. Nutting has never met some of the dim-bulbs on this board.
     
  2. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    No bigger moron than a douchebag on a soapbox with an empty pistol in his hand.
     
  3. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    I'm not in favor of a salary cap, but if they would go down this road, they would also need to have a salary floor to make sure teams don't do what the Marlins do every four or five years. No $9 million payrolls, please.
     
  4. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    obviously
     
  5. Rhody31

    Rhody31 Well-Known Member

    I hate the Yankees, but this bitching is ridiculous.
    They did cut payroll this year.
     
  6. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    Shh, Rhody. Don't tell anyone that the Yankees payroll is going to be LOWER this year.
    You'll ruin the whole damn thread.
     
  7. Smasher_Sloan

    Smasher_Sloan Active Member

    Salary floor is not beneficial in a player development sport like baseball. It forces teams to overspend for horseshit players who won't help them win anyway.
     
  8. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    Very debatable, but, say you were correct, that price simply must be paid.
     
  9. Shoeless Joe

    Shoeless Joe Active Member

    I'd prefer a cap on tickets prices and concessions set at about half the current rate.
     
  10. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Even without the floor, baseball teams have been finding ways to overspend for horseshit and/or unproven talent since the days of the bonus baby.
     
  11. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member




    I've met Nutting, and the bulk of his immediate family.

    They're clearly enjoying suckling at MLB's breast, riding along, awaiting the eventual
    capital-gains payoff.

    Anybody who pays Yankee dollars to enter that ball park and watch the charade these clowns put on deserves everything they get.
     
  12. Smasher_Sloan

    Smasher_Sloan Active Member


    How is it very debatable? Let's say you're the Reds and you have a nice collection of young talent, almost all of whom have less than three years of service time. That's your core. They're under club control, so they're probably all making less than a $500K.

    You know you're going to scuffle, maybe threaten .500 this year, but you have a chance to be kick-ass good next year or the year after.

    But you're not meeting the salary floor, so you have to go out and burn money on some FA who's not going to do shit, or else you have to trade for someone else's mistake, just for the sake of meeting the minimum. What is the point? Does throwing $3 million at Kip Wells show the fans you're committed to winning?

    Why piss away money on Kris Benson or Sidney Ponson or trade for Jose Guillen? Keep the money to sign the younger players as they rise on the salary scale rather than paying some useless turd to sit on the DL for three-fourths of the season.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page