1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

'Me, too'

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Oct 15, 2017.

  1. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  2. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  3. typefitter

    typefitter Well-Known Member

  4. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    Ya mean the asterisk correcting the crux of the article didn't bring you around? JFC, if you eff something like that up -- ya know, who's the plaintiff and who's the defendant -- re-write the whole damn story, don't correct it with freaking asterisks. I skipped right over that asterisk and didn't understand the whole story till the end. This isn't print; ya can correct an internet story pretty easily. Instead they compounded the problem.

    upload_2019-3-11_14-21-4.png
     
  5. jlee

    jlee Well-Known Member

    It lacks a link between the departure and the hiring of a third-party investigator, besides timing. Hiring a third party to evaluate the company’s handling of a sensitive matter isn’t a lot of meat. Nor is the fact that the investigator was hired after she learned of the complaint.

    There’s a story here about a major media company hiring a third party to evaluate its response to a sexual-assault report. It’s fair to note that the EIC left two weeks later. Connecting the two without backing it up by attributing sources is ... not ideal.
     
  6. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  7. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Next up ...

     
  8. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page