1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Mark Buerhle > Jack Morris?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, May 21, 2014.

  1. Bob Cook

    Bob Cook Active Member

    The status of "ace" is subjective with Morris and Buehrle. Morris was generally considered an "ace" because he was the top starter, or deemed to be. Often Buehrle was a top starter for the White Sox, but was never an "ace" mainly because he didn't throw 95 mph fastballs.

    Also, Buehrle never had eye-popping numbers. He never got 20 wins, he never won a Cy Young, and he most definitely never came close to leading the league in strikeouts. The term "ace" is usually reserved for someone overpowering. Buehrle was merely frustrating (to hitters if his curve was down, to his own teammates and fans if it stayed up.)
     
  2. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    Morris actually has four World Series rings, with three different teams -- Detroit (1984), Minnesota (1991) and Toronto (1992 and '93, although he stunk in the regular season in '93 and didn't pitch at all in the postseason).
     
  3. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    That is fair, although I think of it that way more because of Buehrle's junk than Morris' stuff.

    Take away the word ace, and you still have Morris arguably (but no stretch to make the argument) having been the best pitcher of the 1980s. You can't make any kind of serious argument like that with regard to Mark Buehrle in the 2000s.

    And again, Morris was up there in the MVP voting 5 times. Got Cy Young votes 7 times. Buehrle got Cy Young votes the year the White Sox made the series.

    Compare each of them to their eras, and I don't see how anyone who watched baseball during these times could argue that Mark Buehrle to the 2000s was anything near Jack Morris to the 1980s. Regardless of what they think of Morris for the HOF.
     
  4. I Should Coco

    I Should Coco Well-Known Member

    I've always been a huge Buehrle fan, too ... but I compare him more to Jamie Moyer than Jack Morris.

    Moyer had a couple 20-win seasons, a very strong postseason in 2001 with Seattle, and threw more than 4,000 innings.

    That's a very good career, but not HOF.

    Buehrle is a very similar type of pitcher, albeit with a better career ERA, a perfect game and no hitter.
     
  5. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    No, you can't.
     
  6. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    I can't see how anyone who would visit both Twitter and Facebook would think that Facebook's stock price would be higher.
     
  7. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    No I can't what?
     
  8. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Then you should definitely start another stupid thread.
     
  9. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Morris is frequently listed on a lot of all 1980s teams, but it's really misleading since most of the best pitchers from that era, the ones who are in the HOF (Ryan, Carlton, Seaver, Palmer, Sutton, Perry, Jenkins, Niekro, Blyleven... ) were retired by the end of the decade (I think Ryan may be the only exception in that group...) and had their best seasons or are more identified with the 1970s. Others, like Greg Maddux didn't come along until the end of the decade.

    Morris may have the best numbers from 1980-89, but he was never the best pitcher in the game. He never won a Cy Young...

    I remember a veteran baseball writer who I worked with at my first stop said, "If you even have to think if someone is a Hall of Famer, then they're not..." and while I usually agree with that, I think Morris may be an exception, because you hear the name and you, or at least, I would think, "Oh, absolutely, he's a Hall of Famer", and then you take a look at his numbers, and it's a much tougher sell.

    I definitely think Morris is better than Buehrle. I see Buehrle as a good pitcher and a compiler, but not on the level of Morris.
     
  10. Bob Cook

    Bob Cook Active Member

    I'm not sure Buehrle has ever had an arm or shoulder injury, which seems implausible in this day and age.

    As calling a pitcher a "compiler" -- I know that's often meant to be a bit of an insult, but the nice thing about compilers is you know they'll rarely miss a start.
     
  11. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    It's not an insult on any level. He's had a very good career. How many times has he finished top 10 in CY Young voting? I know all-star games can be really misleading, but how many times was he considered one of the top 10 pitchers in his league?
     
  12. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    You cannot make a serious argument that Jack Morris was the best pitcher in the 1980s.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page