1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Lupica on Today show

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by 21, May 17, 2007.

  1. JR

    JR Well-Known Member


    Problem with that, Ragu, is that some kids are demonstrably better--even at 9 and 10--and want to compete at a higher level. Others are happy just picking their nose in centre field.

    Example.

    I have three sons and all started playing hockey when they were around 8 and started at the local house league at the rink around the corner.

    It's great. Everyone gets the same amount of ice time, it's affordable and they all get participation medals at the end. Absolutely nothing wrong with that.

    Problem is, my eldest wanted more. He was a goalie and wanted someone who could actually shoot the puck and make him work.

    Next year he jumped from house league to AAA (He eventually settled in AA hockey). If he wasn't the best goalie in his level, he was sure as hell the most hard working. He strived (and still does) to be better at every level he played and at every sport.

    One of the twins was probably the best player on his house league team but was happy playing there. He liked being the big fish in the small pond. The other twin showed up for the post game soft drinks.

    Telling my eldest that he shit the bed on that second goal wasn't a big deal--he knew it as well--but telling the one twin that he should take power skating lessons would have just drawn a guffaw. He played hockey to hang out with his buddies. No other reason. (Oh, and to make the biggest tapeball in the history of Mimico).

    Point is, travel/elite teams have their usefullness. It's just that too many parents fuck things up.
     
  2. Given the fact that a) we are becoming a nation of sheep, b) that we're willing to accept any depredation that comes from The Company, c) that a lot of coaches and bosses really are idiots, it isn't that bad to teach the next generation a little bit about not respecting arbitrary authority.
     
  3. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    Agreed, a sad and painful event for a kid (and apparently worse for the parent).

    lol. underratedly funny.
     
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    JR/Pastor, I am not arguing against competitive leagues. My problem is with what they have become in practice in a lot of places. I know rec. leagues exist, Pastor. But they are getting short shrift in some places. I know of one town in NJ that used to have a thriving rec. league, and now they can't field a rec. baseball league for one age group with enough teams, because the adults have driven away so many kids by making the traveling team the main focus and priority. Things like that are becoming the norm more often. The thing that bugs me the most is that they set up 9 and 10 year olds as "elite" or little superstars, and at that age, there is no such thing. Sure, everyone knows the kid who picks his nose in rightfield and is never going to be interested in or good at baseball. But there usually isn't much separating the other kids, and to set up a 9 year old as better than his peers does a disservice to that kid and the kid you are saying isn't good enough. Because there is at least an even chance the kid being snubbed has more potential. And if you handle this "elite" stuff wrong, you can drive away kids from the sports. Even more sickeningly, as with everything adults are involved with, in far too many places what decides who gets on the teams are not the kids who are showing the most interest in the sport or the most potential, it's the parents who are most involved. Petty adult grudges sometimes keep kids off those teams. I wouldn't be pointing this out if I haven't had the conversation with so many parents who have dealt with messed up youth sports situations. Those are the things that disgust me. Maybe it isn't an ideal situation, but I'd rather see ONLY open leagues without this nonsense, until the kids hit 13 or 14 and the better players REALLY start to show themselves. Let the kids just develop and have fun until then.
     
  5. lantaur

    lantaur Well-Known Member

    It's hard for kids to have fun when parents have dollar signs in their eyes.
     
  6. Pastor

    Pastor Active Member


    Ragu, I don't disagree with you too much. However, when I was coaching 9-year olds, I could tell which kids were the "elite." Hell when I was 9 and playing in both the rec and travel soccer league, I knew I was better.

    Maybe it is just the sport (I never played travel baseball, only rec). I'm sure there are ways to tell that you have better players in baseball though.
     
  7. JR

    JR Well-Known Member


    Yeah, they're the ones that can catch, throw and hit.
     
  8. Sxysprtswrtr

    Sxysprtswrtr Active Member

    Agree with you - the travel team culture is disgusting on many levels. parents have way more power than they should.

    Disagree with you - kids might "suffer from adult pettiness" but at the same time, they're learning about how the real world truly works. those are life lessons that will come in handy one day if the kid has a good support structure.

    I played on a travel volleyball team for 5 years. I was good - all-conference, all-region, etc. One year, this uppity mom decided her daughter was a better setter than me (we ran a 5-1 offense) and she set out on a personal crusade to get her brat my starting position. Midway through the season, coach pulls me aside and tells me that he wants me to hone my skills in a different position while he gets the silver spoon girl in the starting rotation.
    HELLO!?! My parents are paying $1,000 a season just like this girl's parents. HELLO?!? That girl hadn't earned anything in the way of accolades for her supposed excellent skills.
    So, for half the season, I rode the bench while this girl started. Did we win? No. Were my feelings hurt? Yes. Were my parents mad? Yes. Did they step in to try to alter the situation? No.
    That season taught me a lot about how life just isn't fair. Looking back on the unjust things that happened, it simulates my work culture to a T, where maybe the best reporter didn't get on 1A but the reporter who schmooozed with the editors got his story on 1A instead. Eh, that's life.
     
  9. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    This is my big problem with teams like this. The more vested some parents are (spending $1,000 bucks), the more determined they are for their kids to get a scholarship or be viewed as the best, the more meddling they are.

    Rec league is much more fun because when the players who aren't stars get a big hit or make a play it's something they will remember forever.
     
  10. SixToe

    SixToe Well-Known Member

    finishthehat,

    Not going Lombardi on anyone.

    My point is many parents are all too eager to tell a kid he did great (18 strikeouts) or the umpire was just bad or the coach was just mean or the judge of that band competition just didn't know how fantastic of a flute player you really are.

    Parents say "Nice try" to the kid who bats ninth in the lineup and hasn't put a bat on a ball all season. He can't hit in practice, either, and swings like a ballet dancer.

    At some point, someone should tell him he isn't cut out for baseball and maybe he should try soccer or something else. Or the parent should work with the kid if he really wants to do it.

    Reinforcing mediocre (or poor) performances isn't healthy, though. Giving a kid a trophy for his team finishing 2-14 is stupid.


    BTW, a grand piano would be too large for Loopy. Probably could get by with a Spinet Piano.
     
  11. Gold

    Gold Active Member

    I suppose there is a place for travel teams, but I don't know that nine and ten years old is that place. Maybe All-Star teams at 11 and 12 at the end of the season - no problem with that. As far as knowing which kids are better at 9 or 10 - yeah, you know but sometimes kids start playing more or get a coach or get a little bigger or more coordinated and they get better quickly. I also don't believe in playing five or six kids on a basketball team all of the time... how much better can your fifth kid be compared to your seventh kid?

    When I was a substitute teacher years ago, I substituted in a gym class. The teacher knew he was going to be out, so he left detailed instructions for what to do figuring that he might get somebody who didn't know the first thing about sports.

    Well, I was a sports writer so I knew about sports but I didn't know about age groups. He gave activities for kindergarten, and said no competition because they were too young to handle it. For first grade, he said relay races of different types... one going backward, one picking up a block, etc. For third grade, he had floor hockey. The guy knew what he wanted to do for each age group.
     
  12. spaceman

    spaceman Active Member

    More like the Little King could borrow Schroder's piano from Peanuts.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page