1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Love on the Internets: Looking for input UPDATED!

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Magic In The Night, Nov 19, 2008.

  1. MartinEnigmatica

    MartinEnigmatica Active Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    MITN:

    [​IMG]

    I have nothing of tremendous value to add except, on the first page someone (IJAG, maybe?) said something like please, call her. I concur, regardless of whether it's a her or him, call or something. We spend a good deal of our lives communicating, searching for purer and more meaningful ways to relate, searching for meaningful people to communicate with...and if you've got those chances, those people. Don't waste it. (Not that you will)

    Edit: photo idiocy
     
  2. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    SC, IJAG ducky, cadet, liesl, rosie, 21, gingerbread, wenders, I digress, carebear, grrlhack (although I don't think she's been here for a while), KG. Sxy, HC, waterytart, lugnuts, Dyno, Pseudo, Ballscribe, Jerseygirl (hasn't been here in forever), bagelchick, Lisa_Simpson, Girlinthehood, gretchd, farmerjerome, crazedchipmunk, thirsty and a couple of other whom I'm not sure have really come out as women. And I ain't assuming on granny.
     
  3. imjustagirl

    imjustagirl Active Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    Who the hell is thirsty? (the poster, not a question on if I'll get you beers)
     
  4. Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    dooley comes up with the comprehensive list of SportsJournalists.com women.

    Least surprising post ever. ;D
     
  5. waterytart

    waterytart Active Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    No, no, put aside all thoughts of the woodchipper. You do realize we're going to expect you to tweet this, right? Managing Twitter and a woodchipper both would require being not just ambi- but downright polydextrous. So you're off the woodchipper hook. See, things are looking up already.
     
  6. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    From her posts, clearly an nysj member, talked about her dominatrix friend once.
     
  7. Magic In The Night

    Magic In The Night Active Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    I'm thinking Twitter might be out of the question, too. But I promise to update when I get back from said neutral city. Btw, I just did some quick math for those of you telling me to communicate. We've spent about 220 hours on the phone in six weeks.
     
  8. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty Guest

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    you were worried about big meat?
     
  9. KYSportsWriter

    KYSportsWriter Well-Known Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    So, how many women SJers are there? :D
     
  10. waterytart

    waterytart Active Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    Dooley is doing door-to-door canvassing.
     
  11. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

     
  12. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    Re: Love on the Internets: Looking for input

    Oh, and I guess we can count Carrie, who comes here in some form every few months, then goes poof.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page