1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"Lotteries: America's $70 billion shame"

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, May 12, 2015.

  1. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    They have a choice. Doesn't get more fair than that.
     
  2. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    I'm not bitter at all.
     
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    So it's a coincidence that the poor and uneducated exercise that choice to purchase lottery tickets at a far greater rate than the wealthy and educated?
     
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    It's funny you posted that about Georgia. The people who play that lottery are the biggest suckers in Bloomberg's "Sucker Index."

    There was a thread a couple of years ago when there was a big lottery jackpot and everyone was posting about how they were going to buy tickets and I played the role of the grinch.

    I posted this link on that thread (happened to remember the story): Georgia Lottery Players Suckers Spending Most for Least - Bloomberg Business
     
  5. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Do you think that $230 a year is going to go to a good cause if the lottery ends tomorrow?
     
  6. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Who's more likely to spend five dollars on the 1-in-a-billion chance to win $100 million?

    Someone who lives comfortably on a $150K/year salary?

    Or, someone without a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of?
     
  7. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Like I said, maybe state governments should run payday advance stores, too. If poor people are going to spend money in irresponsible ways, the government might as well take advantage of them to finance the college educations of the middle-class and wealthy.
     
  8. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    And who could really use that $5 to buy something they actually need?
     
  9. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Like what? Maybe they look at their situation and decide to forgo one gallon of milk for the however-small chance that they'll never have to worry about money again. That's a big draw, and a highly likely choice for someone who worries about money every second of every day.
     
  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    I've been clear on this for a long time.

    It -- along with cigaret taxes/prices -- are a tax on the poor, pure and simple.

    Politicians, terrified of raising taxes, or cutting spending, approve lotteries, casino gambling, video poker, and "sin taxes". They raise money, but hurt those they claim to want to help.

    The lottery should be abolished. It's not only a regressive tax, it's a bastion of patronage everywhere it exists.

    And, if cigarets are so bad -- and they are -- then we should make them illegal too, instead of selling them to the poor, and attaching outrageous taxes to them.
     
    Dick Whitman likes this.
  11. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    A dollar and a dream:

     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    People should decide for themselves if they are being "irresponsible" and what they can "really use." Everyone is different. And we're free. I am sure there are things you spend money on that I wouldn't spend money on. It doesn't mean that it's my place to make decisions for you.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page