1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Latest BIGSPORTSWRITER rant: SATs, racism and Derrick Rose

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by sm72, Sep 14, 2012.

  1. sm72

    sm72 Member

    That's my thought. Making it "legal" for amateurs to make money would make stuff like free tattoos and other insignificant crap like that a non-issue, as well, which I think we can all agree would be a good thing in a general sense.
     
  2. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    Some boosters would offer NBA-sized salaries to top-shelf recruits for one or two or three or four years of play. Small schools wouldn't be able to keep up.

    And Oklahoma State would run shit.
     
  3. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    This is one option, and the best. The other option is to watch for the enjoyment, realize that for 95 percent of the athletes a free education is a great deal, and just assume the other 5 percent (and probably some others) are being paid under the table and be fine with that.

    What isn't possible anymore is to consider the NCAA rules to be worth following and to worry about who's cheating.
     
  4. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    How do you know they aren't already?

    And, so what?
     
  5. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    And Oregon.

    Of course, Oregon and OSU have already sort of started running shit the last few years. Amazing how those formerly nothing athletic departments transformed when they sold themselves to Pickens and Knight. Wish some tycoon would buy my alma mater.
     
  6. Meatie Pie

    Meatie Pie Member

    The choice not to support it or throw any more cash down its maw is a conscious one to make.
     
  7. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    It'd lead to the kind of agent/booster/coach abuse that'd make your head spin silly, but if you prefer that to the existence of hypocrisy, OK.
     
  8. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    There's already commercialism in college sports. Either go all the way with it, or cut back to the pure amateur ideal like in the Ivies and D-III.

    And since it's very doubtful any of the coaches, administrators, or any non-athlete will want to give up their huge salaries, then let boosterism run amok.
     
  9. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    How would it be hypocritical?

    The NCAA says that college sports are supposed to be an amateur activity. Yet, there are an awful lot of people making their living off of it. If they want to be truly an amateur activity, then everyone should be purely unpaid volunteers. Coaches, administrators, NCAA officials should be working a FT job outside of sports and volunteering their time for the good of amateurism. And we know, that ain't happening, and it won't happen in the future.
     
  10. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    So what
     
  11. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    Shit, I'm an Alabama fanboi. I was not judging.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page