1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Kids these days

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by QYFW, Jul 16, 2017.

  1. QYFW

    QYFW Well-Known Member

  2. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    For a jailhouse tat, that is not bad. Seen people with worse from tat parlors.
     
    QYFW likes this.
  3. mpcincal

    mpcincal Well-Known Member

    OK, everybody, all together now:

    "NO SHIT, SHERLOCK!"
     
  4. SpeedTchr

    SpeedTchr Well-Known Member

    Just fill the rest in and join the minstrel show.
     
  5. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    Of course, this part might be problematic for employers, too:

    He was locked up in 2015, at 17, for aggravated robbery, after he and a friend pulled a knife on a tourist in Nelson, New Zealand.

    Cropp pleaded guilty to a range of charges, including aggravated robbery, escaping custody and assault with a weapon.


    Someday soon, if it hasn't happened already, somebody will sue for a job over discrimination based on their tattoos. I don't understand people who, when they're looking for a job, suddenly think their gigantic, ridiculous, intimidating, and/or attention-getting-placed tattoo should no longer matter or have any impact. That was why they got it, and got it as they did, in the first place, right?

    What? No, it wasn't?



     
  6. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    No Shirt, Shitlock.
     
  7. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Under which law?
     
  8. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    Doesn't seem to apply in this case, which isn't even a US incident, but what about cultural/tribal tattoos?
    Or if a religion required facial and neck tattooing?
     
  9. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    As long as the employer would treat an equivalent, non-cultural or religious tattoo wearer the same way, it would be OK to discriminate.
     
  10. Why can't he stencil the rest of if it in?
    Worked out well for this guy ...

    [​IMG]
     
    Baron Scicluna likes this.
  11. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    Reasonable argument. I'm not disagreeing with you, just speculating on the path one might pursue.
     
  12. Uh, professional wrestling heel.
    The Progressive Lineral needs an arch enemy.

    Or Low budget porn star.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page