1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Kansas City Star's bizarre approach to a staff reduction

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by PaperClip529, Dec 12, 2012.

  1. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I thought they were going to play The Hunger Games and the winner kept their job.
     
  2. SixToe

    SixToe Well-Known Member

    I know of a layoff situation where a newsroom employee was involved with helping pick co-workers who would be let go or stay. Co-workers did not know this person was involved with the process. The reward? A cushy management position.

    Management has done shitty things to employees for years. We just find out about it more frequently today. Those managers will get theirs one day.
     
  3. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  4. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    Just about anywhere that has had buyouts/layoffs in recent years.

    I understand the strategy. You need to cut staff/payroll, so the first step is to see who is eager/willing to leave on their own. There is always an understanding that staff is going to get cut one way or the other. Management is just trying to find the least strenous way to get it done. If not enough people take the buyouts offered, then the axe starts swinging.
     
  5. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    Every shop should ask for volunteers. Sometimes there's the person who was going to wait another year or two to retire, but hears about the buyout and takes it... Sometimes there's someone who has another job offer on the table and then they take the buyout and the new job... It's better for the paper than forcing them to cut someone who doesn't want to leave...

    And you can bet they play the guilt card.

    But this way is just wrong on so many different levels.
     
  6. CarlSpackler

    CarlSpackler Active Member

    The Joker, actually.
     
  7. Three or so years ago, another McClatchy paper had layoffs, and the two unlucky people were a longtime features writer/columnist and a young high school writer.

    When their time came, the paper approached both writers, telling the older one that he could take a buyout if he wanted; if he didn't, the younger writer would be laid off. She younger writer spent a week or so wondering what her future held, before the older writer accepted the buyout.

    So it's not just a KC thing; it's apparently a McClatchy thing. It's also despicable.
     
  8. Mark2010

    Mark2010 Active Member

    is it less despicable when done behind closed doors? Because that is basically what is happening.
     
  9. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    As Michael_Badley pointed out, this is not unprecedented for McClatchy outfits. A well-known former poster around here lost his job that way.
     
  10. silent_h

    silent_h Member

    I was thinking the "Amok Time" Star Trek episode. With the ridiculously awesome music.

    Also, I third the notion that this is despicable.
     
  11. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    This is the type of shit, where, some day, someone's going to go postal and kill a bunch of executives. And then everyone will be wondering "Why did this happen?" It's reasons like this.

    It'd be perfect justice if both of them got jobs immediately and walked out.
     
  12. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

    Why not just handcuff them to radiators, give them handsaws, and tell them first one to murder the other one and get out of the newsroom gets to keep her job?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page