1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

It's been 24 hours, and bin Laden is still dead

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by secretariat, May 2, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

    Bingo.
     
  2. shockey

    shockey Active Member

    What, now we're going to 'rank' the most despicable people in history? you know my standard for deciding who 'deserves' the death penalty? it's not dissimilar to how many folks determine whether a player is a 'hall of famer' -- i know it when i see it.

    i don't want to threadjack this into a death penalty discussion, since it's apples and oranges, really. OLB is dead. we killed him. and i'm never going to lose a minute's sleep over it.
     
  3. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Certain people's existence are the equivalent of a loaded gun. He could be unarmed, naked and waving a white flag, and shooting him is still self defense.
     
  4. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Eichmann got a trial.
     
  5. Wrong ...
    I have stated several times on two different threads that I have NO - ZERO - problem with what went down and how it went down (some of you could use some reading comprehension classes). NO Problem. None. I'm happy as shit it happened.

    I don't think it's erroneous to note people can applaud the "execution" of OBL on one hand and abhor the execution of a serial killer or murderer on the other. Sorry, I fail to see that being anything but hypocritical.

    As for Big Mac... I don't (knowingly) argue with sock puppets.
     
  6. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I mean, you have to put yourself in the shoes of the SEALs who were in the compound at the time. I guess it's coming out that bin laden wasn't shooting, etc., etc. But, fuck, you're in the compound. There are bullets being sprayed every which way in defense of him. It's chaos. You are face-to-face with the target of the operation - who clearly ordered the resistance that you have faced inside the compound. Looking at it from the point of view of the guy in there at the time, it is more than justified to take that action.
     
  7. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Then you are being obstinate. I've explained it. Others have explained it. We've been honest about some of the confliction we have felt about it, beginning on the thread where you first claimed no one had addressed it. I am against the death penalty as tool of a state criminal justice system. In a battle situation, I believe that you accept surrender. There is no indication that Bin Laden surrendered.
     
  8. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    They were on a kill mission. They were doing what they were told to do.

    If you have any problem with how it went down (I don't...) then take it up with Obama.
     
  9. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Well, I mean, that's why we have elections, right? Presidents and other elected officials make decisions. We hold them accountable on Election Day.

    Revenge is not an emotion that drives me unless it's something directly related to me. Even then, I realize that it's not a very mature way to handle things.

    I take no satisfaction from a revenge standpoint where it comes to Bin Laden because, for one thing, you've basically just taken away his consciousness. That seems like a tiny price for him to pay, to me, compared to what he did to this country and others.

    If anything pleases me about his death, it isn't because revenge was had, it is that a kingpin of international terror is no longer around to push his ideology.
     
  10. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    P.S. Jon Stewart was pretty good last night. Absolutely no ambivalence on his part. I still can't imagine how different it must be for people who were in New York that day.
     
  11. Mark McGwire

    Mark McGwire Member

    Despite the bleatings of others, Evil, I can assure you this is my only handle on this board. I am not a sockpuppet.
     
  12. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Here is the problem.

    I don't think many people would feel bad about a Gacy being executed.

    But a Gacy is much closer to a "person accused of one murder on circumstantial evidence" than he is OBL.

    And that "person accused of one murder on circumstantial evidence" might be innocent. And if he's found to be innocent four years after his execution, well, then we have a problem, don't we?

    So we allow our reservations about the death penalty to cross the border onto other people (like Gacy) because, legally, they are pretty damn close.

    But OBL is not across the border. He's in another galaxy. Not just because of the numbers. But because of his admission, his declaration of war, his reach and how many lives his death might save.

    He's different. I cannot quantify in a mathematical equation exactly how it is determined that he is different.

    But then, I shouldn't need to.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page