ISIS Coming To A City Near You

No, just parenting hours.

 

On which thread did I "debate" an issue by typing the same lazy response repeatedly?

 

Baby is taking her morning nap. I have time to call out phonies for a while.

 

Well, I'm going to get back here to helping combat veterans fight for their back pay. Obviously you are also pitching in to the effort by making snide comments about liberals on the Internet. Proud to be in the trenches with you, no doubt.

 

Gonna take a nap of my own and let you get back to work.

 

Almost 60 percent of all American combat casualties in the war on terror took place in Iraq between 2003 and 2007. What "political correctness" should we have forsaken to avoid those? And, are we arguing that the 2010 "surge" in Afghanistan was hampered by that same "political correctness?"

I just want to know what the score is.

 

I was referencing the part about "adding nothing of substance."

 

Let's face it, unless you're willing to say, "The crusade is on you fucking towel heads!" you're pretty much a politically correct sissy.

 

Stringing for a lawyer. Snap!

Stringing for a lawyer < coffee machine repairman.

But both are still > art gallery schmuck (so they have that going for them)

 

Do you think terrorists really care when world leaders "condemn" atrocities or are referred to as savages?

Is one going to stop and think, "I'm not a savage" and start to cry and lay down his arms?

 

For all the talk of how Bush was a "cowboy," his administration was acutely aware of how the war "played" in the media. You can't expect to adequately prosecute a war against an unrepentant enemy while worrying about public relations and marketing (the Mission Accomplished nonsense being the most egregious example).

 

Not agreeing with what I say is not the same thing as what I say lacking substance. Your posts rarely lack substance, but neither do they make a whole lot of sense.