1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Public Broadcasting Needed Anymore?

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Flying Headbutt, Mar 9, 2011.

  1. Mystery Meat II

    Mystery Meat II Well-Known Member

    The nature of the sponsorship message has changed in the last 20 years. Used to be that they'd either a) not include any taglines or mentions of products, or b) craft a PBS/NPR-specific message (particularly for children's shows). Now a lot of them take the pro forma route to traditional advertising.
     
  2. Bamadog

    Bamadog Well-Known Member

    Funding of NPR is not an essential service of the federal government.

    It's time for our government to quit subsidizing activities (like Amtrack, NPR, agriculture, GM, TARP, etc.) that are not part of its constitutionally-limited responsibilities and should be the exclusive province of the private sector. If you can't swim without a fat subsidy taken out of my wallet, you really don't need to be around. Sink or swim.

    We're looking at debt into the trillions as far as the eye can see. You could argue that NPR's money is not that big a slice of the pie, but you've got to start somewhere. Budget cuts are like a knifefight in a phone booth. Everything gets cut. Everybody gets hurt.
     
  3. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Why is that conservative folks don't get really worked up about the budget deficits unless a Democrat is in the White House?
     
  4. Stitch

    Stitch Active Member

    You're missing the big picture.

    Unless massive cuts for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and defense are on the table, anything else means little. Lawmakers like to pick on the programs to help the poor because those constituents don't fund their campaigns.

    Let's start with defense. Pull out all armed forces from every foreign country and let Guard members go home.
     
  5. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    You could also say this about libraries and state parks, right?
     
  6. Stitch

    Stitch Active Member

    You could also cut the requirement for public notices to appear in newspapers.
     
  7. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    If the government stops subsidizing Amtrak, it should also stop subsidizing the interstate highway system. The amount of money spent on road construction and maintenance in this country -- a $15 billion, underground 2-mile highway through downtown Boston, for starters -- dwarfs any investment made in public transportation.
     
  8. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Agreed. Let me keep my taxes, and I'll happily build my own roads wherever I want to go.
     
  9. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Anything to keep more and more of the public in the dark about the public's business . . .
     
  10. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Talk hard!

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  11. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    [quote author=Bamadog lin
    *actually reads Constitution*

    Oh look, the government is not only allowed, but directed to "promote the General Welfare."
     
  12. Charlie Brown

    Charlie Brown Member

    There are some posts on here that worry and scare me, and not only because they appear on a site with the word journalists in the title. Wow. Just, you know, wow.

    Yeah, NPR funding is sucking us dry, but let's keep playing world police and keep the military industrial complex humming so we can "defend our nation's freedoms" ... many, many miles from our shores.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page