1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is Baghdad really safer post-Saddam? Don't be ridiculous.

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by 2muchcoffeeman, Nov 4, 2006.

  1. You said you didn't trust Shadid's story because of "his track record."
    I asked you what you meant by that.
    You have declined to answer.
    It's time to stop wearing your big pants for a hat.
     
  2. Big_Space

    Big_Space Member

    Again. I posted my thoughts on Shadid earlier in this thread.

    have someone show you how to read previous posts, its kinda neat.
     
  3. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I will see if I can get them to take responsibility. Can I get you to take responsibility for the proliferation of cheesy reality shows on TV and bad music on pop radio stations?
     
  4. THIS is what you meant?
    http://www.penraker.com/archives/006084.html
    Wow.
    Sorry, I couldn't believe someone would take to task a Pulitzer prize winning reporter on the scene who's already been shot once doing his job on the say-so of some blogger who's one step above a can of spray paint and a highway overpass.
    My bad.
     
  5. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I don't think there is any question that Saddam was an awful tyrant or that Iraq was considerably safer for the average citizen when he was in power.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page