I'm not gay, I just sodomize other boys (Wrestling story in NY Times)

Kid and loser mom in Fresno think it's OK for the kid to stick his finger up another kid's anus as part of "wrestling" move.

Victim said the defendant is a bully, which isn't a surprise.

Oh, and the victim "cost" the defendant a scholarship.

Off-topic, but Wwhy do wrestlers who pick on other kids and call them gay seem to be the gayest according to their actions?

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/19/us/19wrestler.html?_r=1&ref=sports

(Check out the mom's hairstyle. I think she's 20 years too old to pull off that look.)

 

Here's the original Fresno Bee story. Good work by a couple of good reporters:

http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/12/05/2185736/was-clovis-wrestlers-legal-move.html

 

Let the jury decide.

 

Of course, the NYT gets the obligatory quote from the female wrestler:

Ms. Tudor, her parents, and any girls taking part in wrestling, YOU WOULD THINK, would have a fairly strong incentive to see to it this type of thing is rather firmly dealt with.

Because if it becomes simply accepted wisdom that "aw well these things happen," their matches (and practices) are likely to be very very interesting from now on.

 

I read the Times story earlier. Was unsure what the hell a "but drag" entailed.

The Fresno story gets into the nitty gritty. I'm not sure how the Times should have played it, but without a better description, the piece was incomplete.

 

Shit. Back in my day the latently gay wrestlers only taped kids' butt cheeks together.

 

I'll tell you what, this "party" sounds as inappropriate as anything else mentioned in the article:

 

Doesn't understand the problem:

 

He wears the standard wrestling uniform.

 

Marge Simpson would like a word with her.

 

Between this and the whole "getting herpes from the mat" thing, there can't be a dumber sport than wrestling.