If you could cover one presidential candidate, who would it be?

From either party???

 

Ron Paul, without hesitation.

Fast copy, he.

 

An independent candidate.

 

Mrs. Clinton. She's going to win, and covering history might be fun.

 

Dennis Kucinich.

I think you all know why:

​

 

Hillary would be the worst, she's more scripted than W. Obama is the one to cover. He'll attempt to implode over and over again.

 

I think covering a third party, fringe candidate would be fascinating, so either that or Dennis Kucinich, who's a fringe candidate but from a major party.

 

Mrs. Kuccinich aside, Paul would be WAY more fun than him.

He's actually a bit dull, all told.

 

Ross Perot.
"If you see a snake, just kill it - don't appoint a committee on snakes."

"Failures are like skinned knees, painful but superficial."

"If we decide to take this level of business creating ability nationwide, we'll all be plucking chickens for a living."

 

And we all know how well he did.

 

Since when does a candidate have to be a winner to enjoy covering them?

 

Ralph Nader, for sure. Lyndon (sp) Larouche, Libertarian candidate is a close second