1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Home Run Kings?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by kingcreole, May 22, 2007.

?

Assuming Barry Bonds breaks the record, who do you view as the true home run kings?

  1. Barry Bonds and Barry Bonds

    12 vote(s)
    41.4%
  2. Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. Roger Maris and Hank Aaron

    13 vote(s)
    44.8%
  4. Babe Ruth and Babe Ruth

    4 vote(s)
    13.8%
  1. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I'll accept this. But I am not sure I understand it. The only way that makes sense to me is if 1) you think steroids are a disqualifier, and 2) you have any doubt that he used.

    I am assuming you do believe steroids are a disqualifier from your post. But a positive test isn't what would make him a cheat if you do believe that, it's the fact that he used. I personally don't see how anyone can have any doubts that he used, which is why a positive test seems fairly irrelevant to me. Why does it take him being dumb enough to a fail a test to solidify your opinion? What about HGH, which they don't test for? What about the time he was using THG, and there wasn't any test for it (and who knows what else that is unknown and can't be tested for)?

    If the testing policy and the ability of the tests to keep up with the users actually was an effective way of discerning who has used and who hasn't, that would make much more sense to me. But hundreds of pro baseball players have likely used and an after-the-fact testing program that still isn't likely to catch 98 percent of the users seems irrelevant to me if you have a ton of other evidence that a guy used.

    If you seriously have any doubts that Bonds used, I'll buy the logic, even though I wonder how anyone can have those doubts. Otherwise, I don't get it.
     
  2. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    I wrote that with the thought that it seems like most people are upset he's going to break the record because they feel he has used, which there's good reason to believe. Never mind that supposedly the Steel Curtain Steelers were juiced up on steroids during their time, which would mean there's a chance that other players in that era (like Aaron) might have also used. But we won't ever know, so we go based on numbers and numbers alone.

    And if Bonds owns both of the home run records, it would be ridiculous for people to argue against him.
     
  3. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    Here's what I think you don't get about the stance of people like me.

    I don't need very strong evidence in defense of Bonds. I'm going by the legal definition of guilt ... "beyond reasonable doubt."

    And that's why I can 75% believe Bonds did use steroids -- and that's still not good enough. I need the smoking gun. I won't throw anybody's entire career under bus for anything less.
     
  4. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Well played.
     
  5. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    As I said, I'll accept it that if you, or anyone else, truly has any doubts. So I understand the stance.

    What I don't understand is how anyone can have reasonable doubts. But ultimately that is us looking at something and seeing two different things. I'm not likely to convince you, and I can't you imagine you convincing me of any reasonable doubt.

    Whether it is all of the evidence that was presented in Game of Shadows, the obvious and unnatural changes in his physique or his home-run hitting prowess for 2/3 of his career compared to his unprecedented increase in ability that made him better than anyone who has ever played at an age that defies logic, there is no doubt for me.
     
  6. Ensign Pulver

    Ensign Pulver Member

    You hear this a lot, but here's something to keep in mind: There are two legal definitions of guilt. "Beyond a reasonable doubt" is the standard in a criminal court case. "A preponderance of the evidence" is the standard in a civil court case. O.J. skated on the former, but was found guilty by the latter. As far as I'm concerned, the preponderance of the evidence nails Bonds to the wall.
     
  7. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    There is no evidence, and no reason to suspect, that Henry Aaron used steroids. But I can point to a lot of things cast suspicion on Barry Bonds. There is zero evidence that steroid use was prevalent in baseball in the 50s, 60s and early 70s. There is a ton of evidence that they were throughout the 90s and into the present.
     
  8. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Suspicion is one thing, evidence is another. I want iron-clad proof -- like Raffy's positive drug test -- on Bonds. Otherwise, there's nothing more than suspicion, which isn't enough to change my mind.

    And considering how you've extended the steroids argument into the present, I'm curious whether you would have the same suspicion about A-Rod, Pujols or any other player who might have a shot at the all-time mark.
     
  9. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Sadahuru Oh and Josh Gibson.
     
  10. CentralIllinoisan

    CentralIllinoisan Active Member

    Baseball deserves what ever home run king it gets; it's lack of steroid testing and still no blood tsting for HGH makes their home-run record forever in question. The worst part of all this isn't deciding who is the best, but the fact we have the contoversy at all.

    No player is bigger than the game; test for it all and throw out those who use. The game will survive.
     
  11. sportschick

    sportschick Active Member

    I vote for Bonds and A-Rod, who will break the all-time record in a few years :D
     
  12. Tom Petty

    Tom Petty Guest

    we can put a man to death in this country without a smoking gun. i'm guessing we can call bullshit on a baseball record.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page