1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Hobby Lobby victorious in SCOTUS ruling

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by BenPoquette, Jun 30, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BenPoquette

    BenPoquette Active Member

    The Supreme Court rules in favor of Hobby Lobby, rules it will not have to pay for contraception as part of its health insurance package for employees.


    Hope this thread will not get locked because I am really interested in the reaction around here...birth control pills are available for $9 a month at Target and elsewhere. This is a win for religious freedom and a common sense decision...despite the ruling coming down 5-4 along ideological lines.
  2. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Millions of harpies who've never been to Hobby Lobby have already announced their boycott on Twitter.
  3. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    There is a powerful cult of ignorance in this country ... good to see its encroachment is being fought.
  4. dirtybird

    dirtybird Well-Known Member


  5. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    They still cover boner pills though right? I'm asking for a friend.
  6. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Damn activist judges.
  7. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Yes, but only for married men who promise to only use them with their wives for procreation.
  8. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Definitely not a win for religious freedom, since HL just imposed its religion on its workers.
  9. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    This is all a ploy to distract us from Benghazi.
  10. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Can't wait till a company refuses to cover in vitro for a lesbian couple who want to have a baby. After all, the evilness of gay people is a sincerely held religious belief.
  11. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Definitely a win for religious freedom since the government was stopped from imposing its religion on a private company owned by private citizens.
  12. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    The same objections raised by Hobby Lobby et al. would obtain there, as well, without touching on (ha!) the same-sex issue. The in vitro procedure, as I understand it, involves the fertilization of multiple eggs but the implantation of only one (typically); the rest are destroyed (either then or later).
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page