1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Here's a stunner: Media coverage favors Dems

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Lyman_Bostock, Oct 31, 2006.

  1. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    So the reporting on it should stop?
     
  2. dog428

    dog428 Active Member

    Yeah, I remember that lack of coverage back '83. I remember thinking then, "Boy, the Internet is gonna be on fire with this stuff. I bet Fox News and MSNBC and Headline News will be all over this baby, too."

    How disappointed I was when I checked those sources and realized THEY DIDN'T EXIST.
     
  3. PeteyPirate

    PeteyPirate Guest

    And the board weeps for young_tony's upbringing.
     
  4. Ah, all the idiots are chiming in, just as I thought. Keep at it, boys.
     
  5. Just so everyone remembers --
    Denny Hastert's running.
    Shymkus is running.
    Boehner's running.
    Reynolds is running.

    The "Foley scandal" is somewhat relevant to those races.

    Here's some more evidence... NOT
    http://www.dailyhowler.com/dh103106.shtml
     
  6. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Tony went to the Humpty Dumpty school of English.

    'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone,' it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.'

    'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.'

    'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master - that's all.'
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page