Helen Thomas interview proves why the press is loathed

And biased, and out of touch with mainstream America.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2009/01/21/what-else-should-report-be-liberal

 

Linkage, perhaps?

 

I'm sure the first comment will be an attack on the messenger of the interview or the picture of Rush on the page, not the actual words spoke by this woman.

 

Why would I read a site which features that asswipe Rush?

 

Actually, Newsbusters is another pile of crap from the fertile mulchmind of wingut welfare king Brent Bozell.

"I am sure that most of you do not want to suffer through this whole, odious interview..."

Yeah, because context is so tiresomely liberal.

 

Proves? What proof is there?

 

Did they do a voiceover on her words?

Nice try.

 

The proof is in the pudding, and they ran out at lunch today, as we've seen. People get cranky at naptime.

 

Yup, attack the messenger and completely ignore Thomas' words, showing you have absolutely nothing once again.

Nice work, Fenian.

 

Thomas and I suppose some of you are in effect saying that there is no way a person can become educated, then make the conscious decision to be conservative. It's the height of arrogance.

 

No, and Fenian's accusation of context would go ignored by him in the Rush Limbaugh interview with Hannity, which is going up momentarily.

Tony, that's Fenian's signature response when he has nothing else to fire.

 

scribe, i'm guessing you didn't actually listen to the interview, which is every interesting, but just read the incendiary copy around it. She's a liberal. Oh, wow. The sun rose in the east this morning, too.
Oh, and by the way, the mainstream just elected a black man president. Which puts you, I think, outside the main.