1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Grammar questions.

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by wickedwritah, Aug 23, 2007.

  1. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    Can you cite some examples?
     
  2. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I think he's full of many amounts of shits.
     
  3. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    The NFL this year changed the amount of years a player can spend on the practice squad.

    "Less" and "fewer" is another one: Freddie Patek has less career hits than George Brett.

    No.

    Freddie may put less jam on toast than George Brett, but he doesn't have less hits.
     
  4. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    Thanks, Simon.

    Here I thought I'd reached the top of the mountain when I finally, finally figured out the who/whom deal.
     
  5. Dan Rydell

    Dan Rydell Guest


    Actually, Simon, there is a rule out there that says a compound adjective with an adverb ending in "ly" should be hyphenated, as in "commonly-known people"...........

    My former copy chief, a solid veteran, showed it to me in print a few years ago, but nobody else in newspapers seems to have heard of it. And I can't remember what his grammar source was.

    I think it's better than the default "any adverb ending in 'ly' never gets a hyphen" because it makes it more clear to the readers. And, anyway, I prefer any compound adjective to be hyphenated.
     
  6. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    My instinct is to agree. Before I learned the "newspaper rule" about this situation, I always used a hyphen because I thought it gave the adverb a stronger connection to the noun, which was its purpose (they go together; it should be as clear as possible that they go together.)

    Newspapering has gotten me out of that habit, and a few others that I used when writing academically. Not sure if that's good or bad, but I know I often get corrected by non-newspaper people (English teachers and magazine editors, mostly :D) when I submit something I've written. Can't help it sometimes.
     
  7. Hank_Scorpio

    Hank_Scorpio Active Member

    What's the proper way to use then/than? ( Hi Moddy :D)
     
  8. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    If you don't know, than I'm not gonna tell you.
     
  9. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    That was funnier then your normal post, Ace.
     
  10. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member


    A rule?

    What rule book are you operating with....?

    --------------------
    Compound Adjectives


    2. However, combining an adverb (usually a word ending in "ly") and an adjective does not create a compound adjective. No hyphen is required because it is already clear that the adverb modifies the adjective rather than the subsequent noun.


    Incorrect: The remarkably-hot day turned into a remarkably-long week.
    Correct: The remarkably hot day turned into a remarkably long week.
     
  11. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    Only such -ly exception that I know of is "early".
     
  12. That's because "early" isn't an adverb.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page