1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

GOAT, QB Category

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Jan 13, 2014.

  1. printit

    printit Member

    Every QB has a lower QB rating in the playoffs.
     
  2. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Joe Montana's career regular-season QB rating: 92.3.

    Joe Montana's career postseason QB rating: 95.6.
     
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Not Montana: 92.3 regular season, 95.6 postseason.

    Brady's at 95.7 regular season, 87.2 postseason.
     
  4. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Nobody has yet mentioned Unitas.
     
  5. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    It's not JUST that Montana's 4-0 in Super Bowls.

    He was as close to flawless as one can be in Super Bowls.

    He doesn't have the gaudy passing records, but in terms of quarterbacking efficiency in total, he was as good, if not better, than Manning.

    Montana's performance in Super Bowls breaks the tie.
     
  6. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    This doesn't seal an argument or prove he was/is the GOAT. Still great to watch every single time:

     
  7. Gator

    Gator Well-Known Member

    It's funny how you'll hold against Brady who he played FOR, but not hold it against Manning who he played WITH. With the exception of Randy Moss, Brady has never thrown to a sure-fire Hall of Fame receiver (although Welker is on his way). Manning around him will have at least two (Harrison and Wayne) and could potentially win a SB with Welker.

    Montana, of course, had Rice, which makes his first two SB wins more impressive than the last two. My favorite growing up was Elway, who never had a good receiver to throw to. A good running game only made him better.
     
  8. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    Excellent post Mike. And I'd throw two more in there - Starr and Staubach. They both ran their respective offense with precision.
     
  9. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    I'm gonna throw out a case for Elway. Obviously his career stats speak for themselves, but he singlehandedly got two pretty average Broncos teams to the Super Bowl.

    The 1986 team was mediocre outside of Elway. The backs and receivers on that team were a joke. Sammy Winder was pretty good, but not that year. Steve Watson was past his prime, and Mark Jackson and Vance Johnson were first- or second-year guys. The defense has some good players (Rulon Jones, Dennis Smith, Karl Mecklenburg), but was middle of the pack statistically.

    The 1987 team, pretty much the same cast of characters plus Ricky Nattiel, had two Pro Bowlers: Elway and Mecklenburg.
     
  10. printit

    printit Member

    My vote is Manning, but this is a very good point. Montana had a lot of weapons around him on both sides of the ball. Frankly, you couldn't build that team in the cap era. What Brady does with guys no one has ever heard of is impressive.
     
  11. joe

    joe Active Member

    Montana.

    And he was worth every penny the Chiefs paid for one particularly memorable Monday Night Football game against Mr. Ed in Mile High.
     
  12. printit

    printit Member

    Elway's in my top 2. I just rank from the 80s on, because I didn't see the older guys play, and the game has changed enough, and I'm not anywhere near well versed on the history of the game to have a meaningful opinion on where Baugh or Unitas et al rank.
    My list
    1. Manning
    2. Elway
    3. Brady
    4. Marino
    5. Montana
    6. Young
    7. Kelly

    I truly believe if the 49ers had dumped Montana earlier (and, really, why would they) Young would have stepped in and been as good/better. The fact that he sat for so many years means he doesn't get above 6 on my list. Aaron Rodgers has a few more healthy, Aaron Rodgers type years he probably makes this list.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page