Gay History 101

Nobody expects the Gay Agenda!

 

Then it blows to shit the argument that gays are gay because they were born that way....one argument your side is using for the "civil rights."

 

JC, meet Dick Whitman. He posted just above. It's OK now to choose.

 

You are using your theoretical future to prove your argument? Logic fail, dusty.

 

Nope, Dickie just implied it could be a choice. Checkmate, either that or Dickyboy is out of step with the GA.

 

Only an idiot thinks it's a choice.

 

Are we playing gay chess now? All queens, no kings.

 

It's really sad that you people who have said this is all OK just haven't seen fit to understand the end of the zealousness that ANY group that thinks they ought to have "special rights" is going to be willing to go...and with all their lawyers already in place....succeed.

 

So Dickyboy is out of step with the GA?

 

Again, at what age did you consciously decide you were heterosexual?

Even for the idiots like yourself who believe it's a choice, religions a choice, are we allowed to discriminate against ones religious beliefs?

 

What the hell?

 

I think that sexuality probably occurs on a continuum. For most people, it's, in practical terms, binary. But the recognized existence of bisexuality indicates that it does occur on a continuum. Therefore, when we're talking about "choice," what we're talking about is letting people know that it's perfectly OK to "choose" to live the "lifestyle" that their biology is carrying them toward. For the very, very, very rare number of people who could go either way, I suppose that could be termed a pure "choice." And I don't think there is any real correct choice, but more a matter of personal circumstances that guide it.